Join 200,000+ other SprintUsers for free at the #1 online community for Sprint cell phone customers! Win cool prizes in our weekly contests. Talk about the newest phones or post your question in our forums! Become a premium member and get unlimited Focus Uploads to your Sprint phone.
All visitors must register before they can post questions, contact other members or search our database of over 127,000 threads and 1.7 million posts. So what are you waiting for? Register for free today!
- SprintUsers.com »
- The Basics »
- Phone Reviews »
-
- Sanyo SCP-5500
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Telegraph User
Join Date: Sep 2, '03
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 16
Phone: SCP-5500!
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SU$: 16
|
Sanyo SCP-5500
Just exchanged my SCP-5400 for a 5500. I found a store in Manalapan NJ that had them in stock.
It's REALLY a nice phone! Not as light as the 5400, but understandably so, there's a LOT of electronics packed into the exact same form factor. It takes decent video, but so far I haven't had success sending the video non VideoMail phones (I guess they're not capable of it). Sending to e-mail works just fine as long as you have a quicktime plug-in. Other than the camera (which takes photos about on par with the 8100, only it's 480 x 640 resolution) and of course the dark navy blue/almost black color, the phone pretty much works exactly the same as the 5400. There are SOME differences though. One I've noticed: you can now disable the "You will not receive ReadyLink calls" message when you launch the web browser or run Java Apps. A big plus IMO, as I found that message on the 5400 a little annoying after the first few times I saw it. One thing I DON'T like about the 5400/5500: Sanyo screwed around with the font on the mini LCD that's used to display the caller ID info on incoming calls. It's now too large for a full phone number to fit on that screen, and it must scroll. So if you don't recognize a phone number right away, you have to wait a ring or two for the number to fully scroll. I think the font they used on the 8100 was just fine: bold, yet small enough to all fit without scrolling. Why screw with a good thing? EDIT-- I know some people on here are probably going to be skeptical, and I understand that with a lot of the junk some people have posted on here claiming it to be true. To prove I have this phone: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~poet/5500-1.jpg http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~poet/5500-2.jpg http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~poet/phone-box.jpg Last edited by scaredpoet; 11-24-2003 at 08:31 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM.







Linear Mode
