PDA


View Full Version : Article not so positive about Moto quality


whiskey7
11-16-2005, 10:52 AM
This article is from The Economist Magazine---

Motorola
Pretty in pink
Nov 3rd 2005
From The Economist print edition
What the success of the RAZR says about Motorola's fortunes

RAZORS can be dangerous, even deadly. But Motorola's sleek, sexy RAZR V3 mobile phone has given the company's health a much needed boost. The world's second largest handset-maker has just announced bumper results, thanks in large part to the success of the RAZR, which is currently the bestselling mobile phone in America. Motorola sold a record 38.7m handsets worldwide in the third quarter of this year, lifting its market share to 19%. One in six of those was a RAZR, which is available in silver and black and, from this week, in pink too (a colour previously available only to celebrities such as Maria Sharapova, a tennis star). With its close resemblance to a flip-open “Star Trek” communicator, the RAZR is on its way to becoming an iconic gadget, next to the iPod and the BlackBerry. It is great news for Motorola, which was going through a difficult patch until the arrival of its new boss, Ed Zander, last year.

By revitalising the company's employees, drawing in new customers and boosting Motorola's brand, “the RAZR is a demonstration of what this company can do,” says Richard Nottenburg, Motorola's chief of strategy. And by highlighting how Mr Zander has turned around Motorola's reputation for clunky design and slow, spotty execution, the RAZR “has been a symbol of all the things we have done right in the past 18 months”. Although the RAZR was in development before Mr Zander arrived, says Mr Nottenburg, he “got this party started” by championing the product.

But you can also make the case that Motorola's revival does not extend much beyond the RAZR. Motorola's other phones still look clunky in comparison. Its much-hyped ROKR music phone, made in conjunction with Apple, is regarded as a disappointment. And having been an early leader in “third generation” (3G) phones, Motorola has since fallen behind. Even the RAZR itself, once you open its slimline case, is let down by its cheesy menu system and second-rate camera. Meanwhile, two rival handset-makers, Samsung and LG of South Korea, have each cooked up their own RAZR-like handsets. The sincerest form of flattery, says Mr Nottenburg. But the risk, says Carolina Milanesi of Gartner, a consultancy, is that “when everyone starts to do it, you lose the edge.”

The big question, then, is whether Motorola can follow up on the success of the RAZR. Mr Zander's plan is simple: “more RAZR”. A 3G version is on the way, along with two new phones, the slimline SLVR and the curvy PEBL. The RAZR Q, a BlackBerry-like device with a keyboard, is due next year. “We have a very good product pipeline,” says Mr Nottenburg. But Ms Milanesi is unconvinced. Motorola still has quality and execution problems to sort out, and the PEBL, announced in February, already looks dated, she says. So whether the RAZR is a symbol of Motorola's resurgence or a one-off hit remains to be seen.

CoreyTheGent
11-16-2005, 06:18 PM
It may not be positive, but it's the truth.

ssaifull
11-16-2005, 10:19 PM
I loved the v600 line of phones... they should follow up on those for the US market, in addition to the other premium lines.

CoreyTheGent
11-17-2005, 04:33 PM
I don't think there's a single person who didn't like the V600. It must've been a little expensive too produce, however. Otherwise I say they should replace that crappy "Triplets" line (V400, V551, V557, etc). with the V600's casing.

Aside from that, to elaborate on my earlier words, Ed Zander will have to use 2006 in order to show the world (particularly investors still wary of Motorola) that the company has made a turn for the better. Great job with the Razr and all but there's still plenty of work in improving quality control, perceived quality overall, and Moto hasn't even made a dent in the business world the same way Nokia has. We'll see what 2006 brings, but thus far I still see too many problems of old and wouldn't put any of my money into Motorola.

Now Nokia, there's a powerhouse making moves for the future.

bluecoyote
11-17-2005, 11:59 PM
I think harping on Motorola for a "Cheesy Menu System" and then saying LG and Samsung are catching up is a little uh... hilarious, as I'd apply that as a dictionary definition for those two.

Motorola's doing a kickarse job in the design department, and the Motorola revitalization stretches beyond the RAZR- the E815 is an excellent phone (unfortunately, the V710 wasn't.) The Moto Q is being regarded as the Treo Killer (though I'd much rather have the Nokia ESeries)

Nokia's more innovative, but you can't fault the Motorola designs. Both beat the living snot out of the Korean companies we're stuck with.

Innovator
11-18-2005, 12:18 AM
Motorolas software is crap, and their build quality is by far second rate. V600s flip breaking off, being recalled? V60s antennas falling off? T720s overall garbage-ness? V400 whitescreen when dropped issues? V710s software, build quality, camera? E815s mismounted cameras, restarting issues, Bluetooth headset echoing?

bluecoyote
11-18-2005, 11:39 PM
E815 has no mismounted camera issue, that's the V710. V600 flip breakage rates are the same as every other flip phone, and well below the Samsung A600 and Sanyo 8200.

Innovator
11-19-2005, 02:51 AM
E815 has no mismounted camera issue, that's the V710. V600 flip breakage rates are the same as every other flip phone, and well below the Samsung A600 and Sanyo 8200.

I guess you weren't familiar with the first shipements of the V600s, which had a little stem crack at the top of flip.

Doomgoggles
11-20-2005, 03:43 AM
The problem with Moto's UI may actually be the fault of hardware. I have yet to see a Moto with a fast UI. Saumsungs and LG's are, in general, much more responsive, and Sanyo's (with TFT's) respond faster than you can input commands. Maybe they just need to step up to ARM-7 or ARM-9 procs.

Regarding build quality: all that has been mentioned were problems with GSM and CDMA phones; this I agree with. No mention was made anywhere about iDEN in that article. iDEN phones are generally second to none for physical reliability. Also: 'Motorola has yet to make a dent in the business world the way Nokia has'? What? In the US at least, Nextel iDENs have dominated the business world -- All Moto's except the Blackberries.

Motorola is a bit like GM. Everyone seems to like them, or certain aspects of them, no matter how much they screw up, because they made the Corvette (RAZR).

CoreyTheGent
11-21-2005, 02:34 PM
The problem with Moto's UI may actually be the fault of hardware. I have yet to see a Moto with a fast UI. Saumsungs and LG's are, in general, much more responsive, and Sanyo's (with TFT's) respond faster than you can input commands. Maybe they just need to step up to ARM-7 or ARM-9 procs.

Regarding build quality: all that has been mentioned were problems with GSM and CDMA phones; this I agree with. No mention was made anywhere about iDEN in that article. iDEN phones are generally second to none for physical reliability. Also: 'Motorola has yet to make a dent in the business world the way Nokia has'? What? In the US at least, Nextel iDENs have dominated the business world -- All Moto's except the Blackberries.

Motorola is a bit like GM. Everyone seems to like them, or certain aspects of them, no matter how much they screw up, because they made the Corvette (RAZR).Even Motorola's own CEO has admitted their lackluster efforts with the business world. I'm not talking about Nextel, I'm talking about PDAs and Smartphones, the latter of which is being dominated by Nokia.

As for Motorola's iDEN Division, they infact produce the most durable cell phones we'll ever see in our lifetime. But for some odd reason they aren't considered when measuring Motorola's quality, just their other handsets.

bluecoyote
11-21-2005, 10:42 PM
My iDen phones have been nothing but crap. Unreliable, awful UI.

As for LG/Samsung responsiveness- do you seriously mean to tell me the A800 is more responsive than the RAZR/ROKR? The LG's is, but LG's quality has just been awful. The lower-end LG's are MUCH less responsive than Motorolas.

Jaggrey
11-22-2005, 03:42 PM
Motorola is a bit like GM. Everyone seems to like them, or certain aspects of them, no matter how much they screw up, because they made the Corvette (RAZR).
That is a fantastic and accurate analogy! :tu:

psychojoe3354
11-23-2005, 10:07 PM
As for LG/Samsung responsiveness- do you seriously mean to tell me the A800 is more responsive than the RAZR/ROKR?

YES!

SEC
11-23-2005, 10:44 PM
I second that.

The Motorola UI is slow, buggy, and unintuitive...oh, it has "skins", but the interface is still terrible, so what's the point?

SuperH
11-25-2005, 10:15 PM
I actually miss the Motorola UI on the Falcons.

Sure, there was the occasional "Please Wait: READING SIM" for about 15 seconds after power on. There was also a lot of lag in the menu. Slow to load Java applications, and a lag between the inside and outside screens when the phone was closed.

Also, many funky errors (like Please Try Again, 481). But, the thing I liked about my i730 was that when I went to put it on vibrate, all I had to do is hold the volume down key while it was closed and it would set to VIBE ALL. What does my volume down key do while the flip is closed? A flashlight. I wish I could change that so that I could assign a combination of keys (like RL+Vol Down), so that I could use the volume control on the ringer while the phone was closed. Motorola had a few things right in the intuitivity department for the iDEN phones at least.

I did notice right away, however, that the Sanyo MM-8300 I have now has a VERY responsive interface. There are horrid inconsitencies (like different developers contributed to different menu sections, and it looks obvious as such), but at least it is fast.

Doomgoggles
11-26-2005, 11:44 PM
As for LG/Samsung responsiveness- do you seriously mean to tell me the A800 is more responsive than the RAZR/ROKR? The LG's is, but LG's quality has just been awful. The lower-end LG's are MUCH less responsive than Motorolas.

There are only a few settings which bog down the A800 UI (the fire, water, and flower fade effects on the grid menu option), the rest of them work fine, and are much faster. With the proc that the Moto's have, if you put that UI on them, it would take literally minutes to switch options. I'm not saying the A800's UI is perfect, but you don't have to use the default setting, which is among the slowest.

But hey, at least the Moto's are faster than SE's, rofl.

 
SprintUsers.com was created in January 2002 as a resource for users of Sprint PCS products and services to learn about and share information. We have cll phone reviews, Cellular Accessories, Downloads, PDA reviews, Ringtones, all of the latest Sprint PCS news and information, an area where you can find help in creating a ring tone or custom image for you phone, and so much more. The most popular section is the message board where visitors can read and write messages, ask questions, and get advice about their cellular phone from other users.