Sanyo 9000 Pictures [Archive]

tbakergobuck

10-27-2005, 07:07 PM

The 9000 camera has a night mode so the low light pictures are better than the 5600 but I'm not sure if there as good as a 535. There are 7 different picture modes: normal, beach/snow, scenery, soft focus, mirror image, night/dark, and sharp. You can take 48 full 1.3 images 960x1280, 179 med 480x640, and 405 low 240x320.

night mode
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/carsmnightmode.jpg
normal
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/carsmnormal.jpg

night mode
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/carnightmode500.jpg

night mode
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/treenightmode500.jpg

night mode

night mode
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/dognightmode500.jpg

night mode

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/outside2.jpg

Matt

10-27-2005, 07:10 PM

Scary night pics again.

tbakergobuck

10-27-2005, 07:30 PM

night mode
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/carnightmode.jpg

night mode
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/treenightmode.jpg

night mode
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/dognightmode.jpg

treo6650

10-27-2005, 07:59 PM

The pictures are still not that good in low lighting. Let see some pics with flash taken with night mode.

Carterism

10-27-2005, 08:00 PM

There are a tad bit better than the 5600.

DEFINTELY LESS GRAINY.

Thanks for the pix! :)

Jake

10-27-2005, 08:03 PM

Thanks Tbaker!

Ovaltine224

10-27-2005, 08:17 PM

blah!!! those pics arent an improvement! im terribly dissapointed in Sanyo! the day pictures come out very nice but the dim and night pics are terrible!!!!

twistedpac79

10-27-2005, 08:21 PM

Wirelessly posted (Sanyo 5600: Mozilla/4.0 (MobilePhone MM-5600/US/1.0) NetFront/3.1 MMP/2.0)

If You Want Good Might Pics Then Buy A Camera.

tbakergobuck

10-27-2005, 08:49 PM

Wirelessly posted (Sanyo 5600: Mozilla/4.0 (MobilePhone MM-5600/US/1.0) NetFront/3.1 MMP/2.0)

If You Want Good Might Pics Then Buy A Camera.

exactly... It's a cell phone not a digital canon eos 5D. :lol: I think the medium size low light pictures are fine. If I took the same picture of the car in low light with a 5600 you wouldn't see all black so the 9000 has improved but just not a lot.

Ovaltine224

10-27-2005, 08:50 PM

my 535 takes wayyyy better night pics

Ronkh

10-27-2005, 08:51 PM

better than the 5600 by a long shot, still not as good as the 535

tbakergobuck

10-27-2005, 08:52 PM

my 535 takes wayyyy better night pics

I've only taken a few picturs so I think it's still kinda early to tell. I don't take that many night pictures. One thing I didn't like about the 535 is that in the day some pictures looked really good and others looked bad. I think the 9000 day shots might be better than the 535 day shots.

Ovaltine224

10-27-2005, 09:03 PM

I've only taken a few picturs so I think it's still kinda early to tell. I don't take that many night pictures. One thing I didn't like about the 535 is that in the day some pictures looked really good and others looked bad. I think the 9000 day shots might be better than the 535 day shots.

play some more with 9000 and let us know! that 9000 backyard pic was very clear

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a89/ovaltine224/82834534277_3300_1.jpg

RattDawg

10-27-2005, 10:25 PM

My big concern is how much of an improvement are indoor mormal lighting camera shots. I guess if the 9000 does that well outside in the dark then those ought fair much better than the 5600.

tbakergobuck

10-27-2005, 11:56 PM

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/outside2500.jpg

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/familyroom500.jpg

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/9000box500.jpg

Jake

10-28-2005, 02:09 AM

How about some pics of the phone! :)

tbakergobuck

10-28-2005, 08:08 AM

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/9000h1.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/9000h2.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/9000b1.jpg

G-Unit_4900

10-28-2005, 12:32 PM

YEESSSSSSSSSSSS! Hows the media player? any improvements!? clearer? larger res?

Deval

10-28-2005, 01:06 PM

YEESSSSSSSSSSSS! Hows the media player? any improvements!? clearer? larger res?

small improvment...they now read the ID3 tags off the mp3 files, but its pretty much the same

tbakergobuck

10-28-2005, 05:57 PM

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/prowlersm1.jpg
pretty good
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/prowlerbig2.jpg

Jaggrey

10-28-2005, 06:52 PM

Wirelessly posted (treo revisited: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/hspr-H102; Blazer/4.0) 16;320x320)

those pics look sharp, but then again I'm on my treo. I'll reevaluate when I get to a computer

G-Unit_4900

10-28-2005, 08:31 PM

Dev: So it has the same preset animations? or do the anime actually move with the song. btw the 5600 reads id3 tags i believe. jus go to info on the particular file. also hows the rewind? 5sec chunks?

Deval

10-28-2005, 08:41 PM

tbakergobuck

10-28-2005, 09:11 PM

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/radio1.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/wendys.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/staples.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/carsbrakelight.jpg

al3azim

10-28-2005, 09:34 PM

e-dub

10-28-2005, 10:13 PM

wow, those last few pictures looked good!

eric b

tbakergobuck

10-28-2005, 10:15 PM

Those new night and indoor pics are not as bad as the 5600. They are actually decent for a camera phone. The ones in the beginning of the thread were similar to the 5600. Did you change anything in the settings?

I didn't change any settings. I noticed a smudge on the lens probally from the clear plastic that protects the lens when it's shipped. I cleaned it so I think that helped some along with I'm the things I'm taking a picture of are better. I think indoor low light full size pictures will not be as good as I was hoping for but if you resize it to medium I think it will look fine. I had similar results with the 535 camera. Sometimes I got really great shots and other times they didn't look as sharp.

NONAME

10-28-2005, 10:18 PM

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/prowlersm1.jpg
pretty good
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/prowlerbig2.jpgNice pics :clap: , the 9000's camera seems to be pretty good ;)

tbakergobuck

10-28-2005, 10:46 PM

I might be returning my 9000 just to see if like 940 better. Also I think the pictures look better because I'm taking more of the same pictures just different lighting angles and picking the best ones.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/9401.jpg
Few more nice shots of my ride. :hee:
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/prowler2.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/prowler3.jpg

Thanks everyone for the nice picture coments. ;)

theclerk74

10-29-2005, 12:33 AM

I hope this works...

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d60/cjaldrich/c11417ed.jpg

This is a low light indoor shot from my old 5600. I can tell you that the night shots I've seen here for the 9000 are LG 535 quality. Very nice.

Jake

10-29-2005, 01:11 AM

Woah! That thing looks hot! I would return it for the sammy ;)

Ovaltine224

10-30-2005, 07:51 AM

the pics are looking better

fatboy

10-30-2005, 09:13 AM

wow the 5600.5 looks like a huge dissapointment in my book

Lockdawg

10-30-2005, 09:15 AM

These pics are terrible I've seen better on a 8200.

tbakergobuck

10-30-2005, 09:57 AM

These pics are terrible I've seen better on a 8200.

you don't have a clue. :lol::laughing:why did you buy the 5600 if the camera sucks so bad?

fatboy

10-30-2005, 10:02 AM

you don't have a clue. :lol::laughing:
he might not have a clue but he has a great point, that has to be the suckest cam this side of well the 5600 :p I hope you enjoy that handset because I cant think of anything good to say about it.

fatboy

10-30-2005, 10:08 AM

and I bought my 5600 before anyone knew how bad it sucked. you had a 535 didnt you? that thing took awsome pics, Id like to get my hands on it if you havent sold it yet

The SPCS Guy

10-30-2005, 10:10 AM

Nice loLet Me Love You {Reggaeton}oking phone, but I can tell you as an owner of the 5600, the 9000 is a bust on the camera. The last pictures look okay and clear,. but overall, the phone is not worth it! GET YOUR MONEY BACK!

JE

SL-10

10-30-2005, 10:14 AM

he might not have a clue but he has a great point, that has to be the suckest cam this side of well the 5600 :p I hope you enjoy that handset because I cant think of anything good to say about it.
People who dis camera phones could just buy a digi cam, right? I mean all camera phones are going to some picture imperfections... So, why complain about the issue?

tbakergobuck

10-30-2005, 10:14 AM

wow the 5600.5 looks like a huge dissapointment in my book

Huge dissapointment? Why? The 9000 is a nice improvement from the 5600. I think the 9000 will be the best EV-DO phone for using the web for a little while because of the QVGA. I'll bet that Samsung will probally screw up the size of the font size on the 900 (blade) like they did on the a800. I don't really see the point to get a EV-DO phone that doesn't have a QVGA. Not to mention that I think the 9000 $379 price is decent. I'm thinking on trying the 6700 but not sure if it's worth $600.

It's funny that some of the 5600 diss the 9000. If the 9000 sucks so bad why did you get a 5600? :rolleyes:

fatboy

10-30-2005, 10:17 AM

People who dis camera phones could just buy a digi cam, right? I mean all camera phones are going to some picture imperfections... So, why complain about the issue?
its not a dis its just a known fact that sanyo should have known goosh every 5600 owner knew that the cam sucked I think its just a dropped ball like a 1ton one right in the nuts for not fixing this cam on this handset hell the formfactor less a few little stripes make this phone more like a 5600.5 not something that should scream flagship. :rant:

tbakergobuck

10-30-2005, 10:20 AM

the pics are looking better

thanks I guess the some of the others aren't wearing there glasses. ;) :lol:

fatboy

10-30-2005, 10:20 AM

It's funny that some of the 5600 diss the 9000. If the 9000 sucks so bad why did you get a 5600? :rolleyes:
I went from a 7400 to a 5600 that WAS a step up adding miniSD and QVGA, but i dont think the EV-DO addon is worth it in the 9000

tbakergobuck

10-30-2005, 10:33 AM

I went from a 7400 to a 5600 that WAS a step up adding miniSD but i dont think the EV-DO addon is worth it in the 9000

Good point. After 3 or 4 months I get bored with a phone no matter what the features are. Right now I'm enjoying that I can surf twice as fast as the 5600. Now I can get more work done. :lol:

fatboy

10-30-2005, 10:35 AM

Good point. After 3 or 4 months I get bored with a phone no matter what the features are. Right now I'm enjoying that I can surf twice as fast as the 5600. Now I can get more work done. :lol:
well now that I feel we agree somewhat get to snapping this is a photo thread :clap:

tbakergobuck

10-30-2005, 10:38 AM

and I bought my 5600 before anyone knew how bad it sucked. you had a 535 didnt you? that thing took awsome pics, Id like to get my hands on it if you havent sold it yet

I was tired of the all the dust particles under the display and I have a 3 megapixel camera that takes great pictures. I use the web more than I take pictures but thanks for the advise. :rolleyes:

*ba*

10-30-2005, 06:51 PM

Lockdawg

10-30-2005, 07:08 PM

I still think cell phones should be able to take good pics. If im in my bedroom with my light on the pics suck. I hate that... thats why i dont want the 9000 if the camera was more improved than my 5600 i was going to think about buying it. But b/c it is practically the same i dont want it and i think im gonna get the 940. It has more to it anyways.

*ba*

10-30-2005, 07:09 PM

Going foward, Sanyo will be forced to offer better cameras.

Now, the 9000 is just a bridge to have something to sell until 2006, when the real flagship is unvieled. Keep in mind Sanyo doesn't have large amounts of cash to spend on new designs/features every year.

tbakergobuck

10-30-2005, 08:11 PM

tbakergobuck, thank you for the pictures. Everybody here might ***** about the phone, but we all buy phones for what we PERSONALLY want.

You want a QVGA/web, others want a camera/camcorder/wirelessBT phone. People just can't come to understand that.

Your welcome for the pictures.. It's to bad that there isan't a phone that has a the complete package (qvga, bluetooth, exspansion slot, 2 megapixel camera).

Back to posting pictures. I took a lot of pictures today becasue it was a nice day but dumie me deleted them by mistake. lol
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/honda1.jpg

*ba*

10-30-2005, 08:13 PM

That's a very nice picture.

ssaifull

10-30-2005, 08:19 PM

Keep in mind Sanyo doesn't have large amounts of cash to spend on new designs/features every year.

Forgive me but I doubt you are privy to such information like Sanyo's internal funding allocations and the like.

... and you sound a lot like tuolumne. :rolleyes:

cproaudio

10-31-2005, 12:00 AM

.. It's to bad that there isan't a phone that has a the complete package (qvga, bluetooth, exspansion slot, 2 megapixel camera).
They do have them but just not Sprint or any NA CDMA phones. I can think of Sharp SX813(902SH), SX833(903SH)3MP, Nokia N90 off of top of my head.Too bad they're WCDMA 3G phones

bluecoyote

10-31-2005, 12:13 AM

Sanyo surely has more money than Toshiba, and Toshiba blew everyone away with the VM4050.

I think the 5600 looked pretty good. In fact, can I say I'm not too shot-in-the-rear with my MM535's camera? My VM4050 took more impressive pictures, though lower resolution, they tended to have better focus, contrast, and saturation.

*ba*

10-31-2005, 12:27 AM

Forgive me but I doubt you are privy to such information like Sanyo's internal funding allocations and the like.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000101&sid=ae_6f4GI5_OY&refer=japan

You think for one second Sanyo has the R&D capital of Samsung?

Revolutionary

10-31-2005, 02:33 AM

The last picture you posted was very nice tbaker.

tbakergobuck

10-31-2005, 06:41 AM

The last picture you posted was very nice tbaker.

thanks :)

ballatwork

10-31-2005, 08:43 AM

I just got a 8300 and I can see a slight difference in the picture quality of the 8300 and 9000.

Sanyo Geek

10-31-2005, 10:27 AM

I just got a 8300 and I can see a slight difference in the picture quality of the 8300 and 9000.

The 8300 has VGA resolution (0.3 MP) while the 9000 has much better resolution at 1.3 MP. That is why the 9000 takes better pics than the 8300.

ssaifull

10-31-2005, 10:51 AM

tbakergobuck, thank you for the pictures. Everybody here might ***** about the phone, but we all buy phones for what we PERSONALLY want.

You want a QVGA/web, others want a camera/camcorder/wirelessBT phone. People just can't come to understand that.

Tuo, I like how you posture that you are actually on tbakers side all the while you get in another plug for Samsung in a SANYO thread. You're pretty slick. Don't forget, it's stuff like that which caused you to get kicked off SU in the first place.

And last i checked, the 9000 has a camera and a camcorder. All it lacks is BT. But it does also have PTT and miniSD, which is better than transflash (nearly 2x the storage for the same price).

ssaifull

10-31-2005, 10:55 AM

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000101&sid=ae_6f4GI5_OY&refer=japan

You think for one second Sanyo has the R&D capital of Samsung?

Are you talking about opinions? You care about what i think? I think that you don't have an apples-to-apples comparision of Sanyo vs. Samsung wireless R&D spending. In fact, I know you don't, you're just speculating based off a news article that doesn't quantify anything or mention wireless R&D spending.

treo6650

10-31-2005, 11:08 AM

What good does the PPT do when we can't readylink nextel customers?

Deval

10-31-2005, 11:15 AM

What good does the PPT do when we can't readylink nextel customers?

because there is a large customer base of RL...my friends on Sprint business side sign up new company contracts daily with RL solutions

bluecoyote

10-31-2005, 02:30 PM

Baker, I want to know how you squeeze such good pics out of a phone. 6,000 pictures with my MM535 and not one of them looks half as nice as yours.

tbakergobuck

11-02-2005, 10:26 PM

Baker, I want to know how you squeeze such good pics out of a phone. 6,000 pictures with my MM535 and not one of them looks half as nice as yours.

Thanks man..I guess I got the eye. ;) I just take a lot of pictures from different angles. I really like Jonacell's pictures.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/water500.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/cloudy500.jpg

CoreyTheGent

11-03-2005, 01:33 AM

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000101&sid=ae_6f4GI5_OY&refer=japan

You think for one second Sanyo has the R&D capital of Samsung?I hate to throw things off-topic, but this ideology makes absolutely no sense. There is no way, unless you have internal Sanyo sources, to determine their R&D capital spending based on some financial results. That'd be like saying GM can't design & produce as many new cars as Toyota, which would probably be your theory if you busted out GM's latest quarterly financials of debt and disappointing sales in comparison to Toyota, yet you'd be dead wrong. Much more to take into account than what a company earned last quarter. Now, to say that with Sanyo's current problems they simply won't risk putting out 20 new phones is a different story, doesn't mean they're incapable of doing so.

Aside from that, the 9000 is definitely an improvement over the 5600, especially the camera. 5600 owners' thoughts about upgrading to the 9000 are in no way an indicator as to whether the 9000 is "worth it" (though your personal feelings are your personal feelings), the 5600 has been discontinued and that argument is irrelevant. It's about you being a new customer going into the Sprint store, being handed a 5600 & 9000, and having to choose which handset you'd purchase. If you can honestly say that you would've picked the 9000 instead of buying your 5600, then Sanyo accomplished its mission of offering a good interim upgrade. Same with Motorola and the V710/E815.

And, as always, nice pics, tbaker'.

*ba*

11-03-2005, 01:50 AM

I hate to throw things off-topic, but this ideology makes absolutely no sense. There is no way, unless you have internal Sanyo sources, to determine their R&D capital spending based on some financial results.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051103/ap_on_bi_ge/skorea_samsung_electronics_1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051102/tc_afp/japanelectronicssanyocompanyratingssandp_051102123 146

psychojoe3354

11-03-2005, 01:53 AM

Sanyo is doing fine. Samsung is doing fine. Sanyo hits a different market, they dont get as much return, but they also dont lose much if something doesnt sell. Wait till the 2006 Sanyos and then take a look at 940. I bet you'll see somethings that the 940 can't do.

*ba*

11-03-2005, 01:56 AM

And I'll bet we'll see a Samsung/Moto like it as well.

A year away is a years away.

etiger13

11-03-2005, 01:57 AM

from what i have seen, the 9000s pictures are way better than the 5600. the 5600 camera was really bad. seriously my gfs 8200 did take better pictures than the 5600. but like i said the pics i have seen so far from the 9000 look really good. time to go look for some from the 940

psychojoe3354

11-03-2005, 01:58 AM

Since this is a Sanyo picture thread, start a new one about Sanyo revenues. Leave this one for pics.

How are the videos? Are they 7400 quality? The 7400 vids looked alot better than the 5600s.

rx7dv8

11-03-2005, 02:59 AM

Night mode seems to work a tad better in that daylight pic you took also.

tbakergobuck

11-04-2005, 04:02 PM

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/b9eb94b3.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/ef9dbcdf.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/686d0fa3.jpg

tooterbugg

11-05-2005, 10:01 AM

Halloween Pic From My 9000

tooterbugg

11-05-2005, 10:03 AM

Sanyo 9000- Bob!

tbakergobuck

11-05-2005, 05:10 PM

tooterbug thanks for picts.

My Girl :hug:
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/95144902021_3300.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/95160887429_3300.jpg
Looks like I got some work tomorrow. :irked:
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/95197599621_3300_1.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/95197999621_3300.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y206/tbaker/95160982149_3300_1.jpg