PDA



View Full Version : Sanyo MM-8300 Cnet Review


tuolumne
08-21-2005, 06:14 PM
http://reviews.cnet.com/Sanyo_MM_8300/4505-6454_7-31453440.html?tag=viddet

mcurtiss1970
08-21-2005, 06:17 PM
it'a as if "no bluetooth" mean "automatic 2 points off" for CNET

freeza
08-21-2005, 06:18 PM
that review sucked.

MRTRIPOD
08-21-2005, 06:35 PM
agreed, cnet needs to get the stick out of you know where

tbakergobuck
08-21-2005, 06:36 PM
that review sucked.

Practically all the Sprint cell phone reveiws that I've read from Cnet suck. I usally don't even bother looking at them.

Matt
08-21-2005, 07:17 PM
Kent German is such a fruit.

Deval
08-21-2005, 07:22 PM
the problem is...we may refute the reviews, but alot of dumb people read it and believe it

MRTRIPOD
08-21-2005, 07:23 PM
fruit? please dont use that type of slur about people

tuolumne
08-21-2005, 07:23 PM
^LMAO...Tripie, are you serious?

MRTRIPOD
08-21-2005, 07:23 PM
the problem is...we may refute the reviews, but alot of dumb people read it and believe it

this is why we refute it

Deval
08-21-2005, 07:24 PM
perhaps...are you a parrot now?

Matt
08-21-2005, 07:25 PM
fruit? please dont use that type of slur about people

Oh no fitte. He is fruity.

You assume I mean fruit as in gay. I mean fruit as in loony. Please do not assume things about what I have posted fitte.

and please try to stay on topic.

MRTRIPOD
08-21-2005, 07:30 PM
perhaps...are you a parrot now?

what?

tbakergobuck
08-21-2005, 07:34 PM
the problem is...we may refute the reviews, but alot of dumb people read it and believe it

true.. Good thing I know my stuff about phones because a few weeks ago I had a Sprint rep trying to sell me a 5500.

gla17624
08-21-2005, 07:56 PM
dude i just looked at the reviews that cnet had for other cell phones too. they were giving better scores to phones like the moto v300, v220 AND t720 (ALL TERRIBLE MOTOROLA PHONES) than they were the sanyos?! i know from experience with tons of customers that many of those motos just aren't made well. dude, cnet sucks! i think it's better to get reviews from companies that actually talk to thousands of people about phones (like consumer reports) instead of having one person review a phone. cnet spends a few hours with a phone, while you have REAL people who spend a year or two with a phone and see that alot of phones just don't last like the sprint phones do. now that i think about it, consumer reports ranks sprint service itself very low also- :rolleyes:

jaytv
08-21-2005, 08:09 PM
the problem is...we may refute the reviews, but alot of dumb people read it and believe it

That's the problem with Cnet. They are so inconsistent, and have a large footprint. The New York Times uses them to write their technology columns for goodness' sake! Oh wait, bias at the NYT, that doesn't surprise me after all...

I wish there was a viable rival to Cnet in the public consciousness...

 
SprintUsers.com was created in January 2002 as a resource for users of Sprint PCS products and services to learn about and share information. We have cll phone reviews, Cellular Accessories, Downloads, PDA reviews, Ringtones, all of the latest Sprint PCS news and information, an area where you can find help in creating a ring tone or custom image for you phone, and so much more. The most popular section is the message board where visitors can read and write messages, ask questions, and get advice about their cellular phone from other users.