View Full Version : Pictures taken WITH the 5600
Email them to tfink@suscom.net
I'll host 'em and post 'em... please use full size and quality.
Credit to SEL1965 for this one... the first full picture from a 5600. Props!
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/SEL1965.jpg
sel1965
03-03-2005, 01:21 PM
Thanks Ted for posting!
Strider420
03-03-2005, 01:22 PM
Not bad. Not SharpTM150 good but not MotoV710 bad.
donblay
03-03-2005, 01:23 PM
might be a stupid questin, but where's the link? i wanna see it :D
MsRandall
03-03-2005, 01:24 PM
Mouth drops and credit card falls out of purse...now do I have enough available credit after my downpayment on my car????????????????????????????
sel1965
03-03-2005, 01:38 PM
Mouth drops and credit card falls out of purse...now do I have enough available credit after my downpayment on my car????????????????????????????
I have to say msrandall I am not dissappointed at all! In fact I think I am more impressed than ever!
MsRandall
03-03-2005, 01:40 PM
I have to say msrandall I am not dissappointed at all! In fact I think I am more impressed than ever!
The quality does seem good...now get to taking more pictures....we need more pictures please...thanks
tommy_xo
03-03-2005, 01:42 PM
check this thread out and compare the two camera phone one the sanyo with the Cmos sensor and the lg vx8000 with the ccd sensor im thinking i will save my money for the Samsung A800.....
http://howardforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=558690 :confused:
send me more pics to post, anyone?
sel1965
03-03-2005, 01:49 PM
check this thread out and compare the two camera phone one the sanyo with the Cmos sensor and the lg vx8000 with the ccd sensor im thinking i will save my money for the Samsung A800.....
http://howardforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=558690
:confused:
I think the biggest difference will be on indoor pics. The outdoors are great and I think as long as there is good lighting the pics should be just fine.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 01:50 PM
yeah that'll be the true test, let's see some pics in moderate-to-dim lighting...
Wirelessly posted (SHARP-TM-150/1.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.2.6.c.2.102 (GUI) MMP/1.0)
Not bad. Not SharpTM150 good but not MotoV710 bad.
Yes. I totally agree.
Credit goes to theCvgUnit...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT.JPG
pdx77
03-03-2005, 01:57 PM
Was that taking at the highest setting? I thought it would take better pictures than that, even my $100 Sharp phone takes better pictures :)
Philby
03-03-2005, 01:57 PM
Keeping in mind this is probably the best cam on a phone sprint has released....
Is it just me or do the leaves/needles on the trees look a little blurry?
TheCvgUnit Again...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT2.JPG
TheCvgUnit Again...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT3.JPG
TheCvgUnit Again...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT4.JPG
theCvgUnit
03-03-2005, 02:00 PM
NT is me. its really bright out here because of the snow. I did the best i could.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 02:02 PM
yeah it's reeeeally bright... how about some indoor pics?
pdx77
03-03-2005, 02:03 PM
ok, I'll admit I'm not impressed at all.
Jonacell
03-03-2005, 02:04 PM
Is it just me or do the leaves/needles on the trees look a little blurry? I'm see that too. It's like the pictures are paintings. i'm begining to see a pattern. Maybe they aren't on highest quality. (maybe there's a "fine" setting...etc..) I hope this is the case. I want to see other 5600's owners post pics. (don't forget to post indoor pics! and test the marco!)
thanks 5600's owners :)
NT is me. its really bright out here because of the snow. I did the best i could.
*updated posts to give credit*
MsRandall
03-03-2005, 02:07 PM
Okay on the picture of the Navigator you cant even make out the name on the badge...but hell I still want the phone....
bluecoyote
03-03-2005, 02:08 PM
Well, let's compare it to the Samsung MMA700 - the pictures are far better. While they're not the best, they're VERY, VERY GOOD! Sanyo so far seems to have done a magnificent job!
In all fairness the glare probably made thecvgunit's pics less clear, all that snow and white background. let's see some colorful pics up in here.
theCvgUnit
03-03-2005, 02:10 PM
Okay on the picture of the Navigator you cant even make out the name on the badge...but hell I still want the phone....
Thats because its an Aviator! Just messin with ya. Im tryin my best.
Jonacell
03-03-2005, 02:10 PM
check this thread out and compare the two camera phone one the sanyo with the Cmos sensor and the lg vx8000 with the ccd sensor im thinking i will save my money for the Samsung A800.....
http://howardforums.com/showthread.php?threadid=558690 :confused: holy crap i just saw those pics from the vx8000 it's impressive.
...but i still want to see more 5600's pics. (can someone post a picture the way it looks when it's in an email.-when send by picture mail. gracias in advance.)
Strider420
03-03-2005, 02:11 PM
Looks like the old Sanyo curse is back! Pics look good close up but get farther than 5 feet and it start to look like a fingerpainting.
send it to me i'll post it...
i'm only at work until 3:30, anything sent to me after 3:30 will get posted at 8:00 tomorrow morning.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 02:13 PM
Looks like the old Sanyo curse is back! Pics look good close up but get farther than 5 feet and it start to look like a fingerpainting.
i was about to say the same exact thing. look at the brick picture, the bricks look clear as day... then the trees, ugh the trees...
come on guys, third time i'm asking, how about some pics with indoor lighting??
theCvgUnit
03-03-2005, 02:13 PM
holy crap i just saw those pics from the vx8000 it's impressive.
...but i still want to see more 5600's pics. (can someone post a picture the way it looks when it's in an email.-when send by picture mail. gracias in advance.)
If we had weather like that in CT(sunny with no snow) Im willing to bet the 5600 would produce the same quality.
Jonacell
03-03-2005, 02:15 PM
Well, let's compare it to the Samsung MMA700 - the pictures are far better. While they're not the best, they're VERY, VERY GOOD! Sanyo so far seems to have done a magnificent job! we don't have much to compare it to. we don't have many 5600's pictures yet. (but if i judge the 5600's pics now, i think the samsung a700 and the audiovox 8920 take better shots.) do you see the blurry leaves? we need more pics. still too early to tell fairly...
ssaifull
03-03-2005, 02:16 PM
the pic's are all little red x's right now :(
the pic's are all little red x's right now :(
shouldn't be, try hitting refresh... is anyone else experiencing this?
theCvgUnit
03-03-2005, 02:18 PM
Some inside pics are on the way......give me a sec to send to Ted
pdx77
03-03-2005, 02:19 PM
shouldn't be, try hitting refresh... is anyone else experiencing this?
Works good for me.
TheCVGUnit Strikes again...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT5.JPG
CVG is all over this mofo...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT6.JPG
Where are SU's up and coming photographers? Where is the Chellster!!!!!
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 02:27 PM
was that coke can taken with macro mode? If so, eww...
and cvg, is the room's light tinted like that or does the camera have a nasty orange tint in low lighting?
theCvgUnit
03-03-2005, 02:28 PM
was that coke can taken with macro mode? If so, eww...
and cvg, is the room's light tinted like that or does the camera have a nasty orange tint in low lighting?
No macro (next pic will be macro). The room is lit with one of those stupid energy savers that drives me crazy, but I always forget to switch!
pdx77
03-03-2005, 02:28 PM
Please tell me that those pictures were not taken with the highest settings.
Strider420
03-03-2005, 02:30 PM
Please tell me that those pictures were not taken with the highest settings.
Hey Mtied, we are just spoiled because of the Sharp. That is probably the highest settings and I have seen worst.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 02:32 PM
I'd be mighty impressed if this was December 3, 2004.
Somebody better slap some Macro-Mode pictures up.
theCvgUnit
03-03-2005, 02:32 PM
Hey Mtied, we are just spoiled because of the Sharp. That is probably the highest settings and I have seen worst.
Im not really good at tweaking things. Im sure later there will be someone who can take better pics than i have.
CVGunit...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT7.JPG
mcurtiss1970
03-03-2005, 02:33 PM
i'm not impressed nor unimpressed. i'm neutral, i guess: like Switzerland.
Jonacell
03-03-2005, 02:33 PM
No macro (next pic will be macro). Thanks TheCvgUnit for all these pics :) and ted for posting them! i want to see pics that aren't blown up large...
*reloads/refreshes page
here's a Samsung a700/Audiovox 8920 pics thread: http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=57917&page=1&pp=15
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT8.JPG
Keep the emails coming, I will post everything I receive overnight first thing in the morning.
sel1965
03-03-2005, 02:34 PM
Looks like the old Sanyo curse is back! Pics look good close up but get farther than 5 feet and it start to look like a fingerpainting.
I would have to agree with you on that if you take the pic within say 5-10 ft of what your want you will be fine but get further than that and your in trouble. I haven't been able to get a good inside pic yet in low light so it may not be possible. Whoever said the samsung and 8920 take better pics good thing that's only an opinion because I have had both and this one is a little better than both. I didn't really like the samsung photos the 8920 really took good outdoor pics but the indoor were pretty much just like the ones I have taken so far if you keep the pic small it looks better the larger you make the pic the grainier it gets.
pdx77
03-03-2005, 02:34 PM
http://www.tmoinfo.com/images/soda1.jpg
Shot in Marco mode from the TM150 ($100 phone)... ok, I'll stop spoling your fun now.
sel1965
03-03-2005, 02:36 PM
http://www.tmoinfo.com/images/soda1.jpg
Shot in Marco mode from the TM150 ($100 phone)... ok, I'll stop spoling your fun now.
Looks like the diet coke pic from earlier!
Tarbash
03-03-2005, 02:38 PM
quality is better...but still not a point and shoot replacement
pdx77
03-03-2005, 02:40 PM
Nah, the diet coke picture, the can was blurry.
Is the 5600 a learning camera?
arpy64
03-03-2005, 02:41 PM
i'm not impressed nor unimpressed. i'm neutral, i guess: like Switzerland.
I'm the same. The pics aren't bad...but not great either.
I'm actually more interested in the audio/MP3 functions of the phone than the photo features. But that's a different thread....hopefully.....anybody?
theCvgUnit
03-03-2005, 02:43 PM
I tried to put MP3's on the disk via the USB (mass Storage) but it tells me its read only. Any ideas so I can try this out?
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 02:45 PM
No MP3s on the disc. Internal memory only.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 02:57 PM
That can't be true. That would be pretty retarded. What's the point of the MP3 player then? The average song in MP3 format is like 5MB...
arpy64
03-03-2005, 02:58 PM
No MP3s on the disc. Internal memory only.
Huh? Are you saying you can only store MP3's on the internal memory and NOT on the disc?
That doesn't make sense.
No MP3s on the disc. Internal memory only.
no way!!!!.....that cant be true......there would be no point to the card then.....
pdx77
03-03-2005, 03:00 PM
no way!!!!.....that cant be true......there would be no point to the card then.....
Other than to store pictures / videos on them. Trust me, having the card is really nice to have.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 03:03 PM
Nevermind, I'm mistaken. That was concerning mp3 ringtones from the card, not playback usage.
pdx77
03-03-2005, 03:04 PM
Nevermind, I'm mistaken. That was concerning mp3 ringtones from the card, not playback usage.
ok, that makes sense.
Other than to store pictures / videos on them. Trust me, having the card is really nice to have.
still dont beleive it.......they wouldnt consider this phone an mp3 player and give you a stereo headset to listen to the 1/2 of song you could fit on the internal memory......he said his card said read only......there has to be a setting to change that......if it was read only you wouldnt be able to put anything on the card period.......
Nevermind, I'm mistaken. That was concerning mp3 ringtones from the card, not playback usage.
aaahhhhhhh.....if that was true my phone would be on its way back as soon as i got home from work......wouldnt of even opened the box......well, maybe i would have......for a second.....
fatboy
03-03-2005, 03:17 PM
send it to me i'll post it...
i'm only at work until 3:30, anything sent to me after 3:30 will get posted at 8:00 tomorrow morning.
email the pics to me fatboypup@gmail.com and I'll host them and post em. Also Ive got tons of gmail invites left for anyone that needs one :o
fatboy
03-03-2005, 03:19 PM
Nevermind, I'm mistaken. That was concerning mp3 ringtones from the card, not playback usage.
i about **** my pants
icsedge1
03-03-2005, 03:38 PM
I tried to put MP3's on the disk via the USB (mass Storage) but it tells me its read only. Any ideas so I can try this out?
don't take this the wrong way, but is the little read/write switch on the card set to 'write'?
just, you know, in your elation/joy over the phone, you may not have noticed... :hee:
sedge
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 03:39 PM
don't take this the wrong way, but is the little read/write switch on the card set to 'write'?
just, you know, in your elation/joy over the phone, you may not have noticed... :hee:
sedge
lol i was gonna bring that up but didn't wanna sound like a smart@ss :)
americomcellula
03-03-2005, 03:46 PM
You dont have to email them and get hosted you can go to http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/ and it creates the Vb tags for you instantly to copy and paste on here to show your image.
donblay
03-03-2005, 03:53 PM
http://www.tmoinfo.com/images/soda1.jpg
Shot in Marco mode from the TM150 ($100 phone)... ok, I'll stop spoling your fun now.
I realize you're trying to prove a point, but it’s almost a bit rude to willingly try to rain on their parade. Let them enjoy their new phone, even if you may not like it as much as your $100 phone.
pdx77
03-03-2005, 03:58 PM
I realize you're trying to prove a point, but it’s almost a bit rude to willingly try to rain on their parade. Let them enjoy their new phone, even if you may not like it as much as your $100 phone.
Nah! :) No harm done, just having some fun with you all.
tweety
03-03-2005, 05:20 PM
Heh guys, i just got the 5600!!! Whoever is taking the pic's that are posted make sure you have pealed off the clear plastic protective peel infront of the camera lens. I didnt do this at first and the pics were a little blurry. I took it off and am amazed at how great of a camera this thing really has!!!
fatboy
03-03-2005, 05:20 PM
Heh guys, i just got the 5600!!! Whoever is taking the pic's that are posted make sure you have pealed off the clear plastic protective peel infront of the camera lens. I didnt do this at first and the pics were a little blurry. I took it off and am amazed at how great of a camera this thing really has!!!
email me them pics if you need hosting fatboypup@gmail.com and ill get em up tonite
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 06:04 PM
yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm back...
Can we get some lower res photos? They look like blown up 5500 shots. The Audiovox still has the best camera, with the Samsung not being any better or worse than the 5600.
mcurtiss1970
03-03-2005, 06:05 PM
yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm back...
Can we get some lower res photos? They look like blown up 5500 shots. The Audiovox still has the best camera, with the Samsung not being any better or worse than the 5600.
that was a quick trip back from the Bahamas:hee:
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 06:10 PM
yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm back...Good to have you back.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 06:11 PM
yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm back...
Can we get some lower res photos? They look like blown up 5500 shots. The Audiovox still has the best camera, with the Samsung not being any better or worse than the 5600.
Are you kidding? I know right now the pics aren't looking too hot, but they're still noticeably better than the 5500's...
and yeah, that was quick. :hee:
Marlon_JB2
03-03-2005, 06:11 PM
yeah, yeah, yeah, I'm back...
Can we get some lower res photos? They look like blown up 5500 shots. The Audiovox still has the best camera, with the Samsung not being any better or worse than the 5600.
I had a feeling this would happen. :eyeroll:
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 06:14 PM
You should have know by now. Really, I don't know who I was kidding. I was just flustered with the 14+ 5600 threads.
mcurtiss1970
03-03-2005, 06:16 PM
You should have know by now. Really, I don't know who I was kidding. I was just flustered with the 14+ 5600 threads.
did you at least get a tan and drink some rum by the pool?
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 06:16 PM
Are you kidding? I know right now the pics aren't looking too hot, but they're still noticeably better than the 5500's...
and yeah, that was quick. :hee:
If we can get some 320x240 shots from the 5600, we'll find out. As of now, in 1.3 MP's, they look blury oversaturated.
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 06:16 PM
did you at least get a tan and drink some rum by the pool?
Yeah, I got that far.:)
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 06:17 PM
blurry + oversaturated > grainy + orange
booey
03-03-2005, 06:26 PM
as others have said, pics are "Not Bad" , but for 400+ dollars, just not worth it IMO.
I'm with tuolumne , im keeping my ole A620/VGA1000 until a VX8000 quality Camera comes out. A800 hopefully!!!
b
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 06:31 PM
I agree. The Samsung A8 will be a far superior phone.
Hopefully the mp3 player inside of it is something along the line of Samsung's YH portable players.
jbjtkbw00
03-03-2005, 06:34 PM
I guess I will have to watch this for a while, but for all the hype, I'm not impressed. Sorry 5600'ers.
booey
03-03-2005, 06:43 PM
i would just like to know who is doing the designing for these cell phone companies.. absolutely no originality, creativity or cutting edge designs.. for god sake, these phone designs are absolutely horrible.
Who can honestly look at the design of the 5600 and say "thats hot!" ??
at least Moto is taking some chances with the Razor.. Its the year 2005 , and we still have phone models from 1999.....amazing
b
EDIT: ok, not 1999 , maybe 2001
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 06:47 PM
I guess I will have to watch this for a while, but for all the hype, I'm not impressed. Sorry 5600'ers.
You mean... for once... something is actually not living up to its hype?!!?!
IMPOSSIBLE!
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 06:51 PM
I agree. The Samsung A8 will be a far superior phone.
Hopefully the mp3 player inside of it is something along the line of Samsung's YH portable players.
When are you getting your 5600 Corey?
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 06:52 PM
I'm not even sure if any of these 5600 pictures were taken in Macro-Mode, not to mention the lack of variety as they mostly came from one person in one climate. 5600 hasn't even been fully released yet, it's far too early to pass judgment.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 06:52 PM
When are you getting your 5600 Corey?Hopefully before April.
jbjtkbw00
03-03-2005, 07:01 PM
You mean... for once... something is actually not living up to its hype?!!?!
IMPOSSIBLE!
Believe me, after the whole T608 ordeal, I thought I'd never see a post about anything else until THIS phone was hinted at. Go figure....... :eyebrow:
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 07:09 PM
Hopefully before April.
Cool. You better get an A8 to and give me a review ;)
jackiegrrr12
03-03-2005, 07:09 PM
The pics doesn't even look good at all. Someone probably forgot to remove the plastic cover when taking these pics.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 07:13 PM
at least Moto is taking some chances with the Razor.. Its the year 2005 , and we still have phone models from 1999.....amazingI agree. Motorola seems to be the only manufacturer still willing to take chances. With everybody else, their designs are just unique enough so that they're still "Safe," no big risks. The Razr V3 could've been the biggest flop in cellular history (and was on the verge of being so at first), yet they still put it out. You wouldn't see anything like that from anyone else.
Now that I'm done Moto D*cklicking, hasn't this been the same route with most Sanyo phones since the 5300? Hyped up, initially disappointed then it turns out to be a big hit? Cheer up, people. Wait for some more reviews/pics/info at least.
I bet you Sanyo'll end up getting that JD and Power award again this year.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 07:18 PM
^Likely.
What's ducklicking? :hee:
Halo2Proz
03-03-2005, 07:20 PM
my other tech has it, and we took some sample pix here at work, and they all look nice to me...oh well...mine is @ home waiting
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 07:22 PM
You must have had the longest day ever.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 07:22 PM
Yeah, personally I'm waiting for Deval's word.
People were expecting this phone to be the coming of Jesus, you set your sights too high. I can't blame them, though. Like I said, it's faulted by whoever decided to release the 7400 before the 5600. So far, it's exactly what I expected it to be.
Halo2Proz
03-03-2005, 07:36 PM
You must have had the longest day ever.
bro...YOU have NO idea
Halo2Proz
03-03-2005, 07:38 PM
Yeah, personally I'm waiting for Deval's word.
People were expecting this phone to be the coming of Jesus, you set your sights too high. I can't blame them, though. Like I said, it's faulted by whoever decided to release the 7400 before the 5600. So far, it's exactly what I expected it to be.
after using my other tech's phone...it seems to be good...but i'll be ready to post up a nice review later...basically from what i've seen, the videos look great and so does the mp3 player...the only problem is...i made the videos on the miniSd card at 176x220 res...so it looks blocky on the QVGA screen
I appreciate you guys waiting for my review :tu:
GoRams08
03-03-2005, 07:58 PM
I appreciate you guys waiting for my review :tu:
Yeah yeah, ppl stop stroking his ego!
Cross this side of the hudson with the 5600 and I garantee you, it will not go back to jersey lol
Jonacell
03-03-2005, 08:06 PM
i gave deval a lovely IM ;)
i can't wait for the reviews.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 08:10 PM
I'm not gonna lie, I'm waiting for his review too more than anyone else's.
jackiegrrr12
03-03-2005, 08:11 PM
Lets wait until Deval plays with this phone a little while and see what he says.
bluecoyote
03-03-2005, 08:20 PM
The camera is fairly on-par with the Tm150, which is sad, because the Tm150 has a CCD sensor.
The camera on the 5600 is fairly nice. I'm sure someone will take some very nice pics with it, soon!
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 08:21 PM
How are you making those statements without the phone in your possession?:confused:
jackiegrrr12
03-03-2005, 08:24 PM
The camera is fairly on-par with the Tm150, which is sad, because the Tm150 has a CCD sensor.
The camera on the 5600 is fairly nice. I'm sure someone will take some very nice pics with it, soon!
So that means you are saying the Sanyo 5600 takes good pictures since its on-par with the TM150, which has a CCD sensor?
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 08:28 PM
uh....try again BlueCoyote! I need Matt to get here and post some of those TM105 pictures. MUCH clearer and less saturated than these pictures. And it's a CCD image processor, not a lens, get it right Blue.
bluecoyote
03-03-2005, 08:28 PM
So that means you are saying the Sanyo 5600 takes good pictures since its on-par with the TM150, which has a CCD sensor?
Relatively, yes. The Escape picture is a noticeable improvement over the magenta-tinged Audiovox and the crap-for-dynamic-range A700.
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 08:29 PM
Audiovox pictures are better than this Blue. Do a side by side look through. A700's are right on par with this phone's, which ain't saying much.
Marlon_JB2
03-03-2005, 08:32 PM
Yup... Deval's review will be worth the read, no matter how long or short it will be. :)
Can't wait...
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 08:38 PM
The only thing that will hurt you more than the A8's delays, tuolumne, is the fact that your smut campaign can't stop the 5600's shine. Once it's officially released, you'll be back to contemplating a "Vacation."
Do you plan to bring the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth in here against the 5600?
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 08:50 PM
I think it might be good if the A8 is delayed. Might mean I am forced to use my rebate check.
bluecoyote
03-03-2005, 09:18 PM
Well, Tuo, that's your opinion, but in my mind, my opinion is worth more, and I say it's on par with the Tm150 and, in my opinion you don't know what you're talking about because my opinion says you don't look at phones objectively.
Of course, it's my opinion.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 09:21 PM
Pot, meet kettle.
sneak
03-03-2005, 09:25 PM
I don't take either of them seriously what-so-ever. Their opinions are irrelevant to me, especially Tuolumne.
He had a chance here to at least sround like he gave this phone a shot, but once again, hes slamming it without using it.
:rolleyes: Oh well.
flipn0tic
03-03-2005, 09:26 PM
Okay I know I wasn't helping, but if we keep ANY thread on topic, let it be the two big 5600 ones.
Deval must be home by now... *taps foot anxiously*
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 09:31 PM
Spare me
TM-105:
http://www.tmoinfo.com/images/soda1.jpg
5600:
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT5.JPG
TM-105:
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/50227003.jpg
5600:
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/NT3.JPG
please stop the utterly ridiculous claims that the 5600's camera is somehow superior to the TM-105's.
Deval
03-03-2005, 09:32 PM
well yeah i'm home...no the phone isnt activated yet...really exhausted from work...but dont worry...i'll be posting pix and reviews shortly
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 09:35 PM
I'll wait for your bias review, just as I'm sure many others will be to my A8's
Jonacell
03-03-2005, 09:35 PM
i'm sorry but i'm sure the a700 can take better shots than that tree photo.
*waits for reviews*
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 09:35 PM
Take your time, Deval, and give us a thorough, long review with pictures in Macro-Mode, please. We've all had enough of the 5 questions answered every 10 posts.
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 09:37 PM
Deval, I was joking if you didn't already know:)
I for one await your review. Your A680 one that I can remember was excellent :tu:
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 09:39 PM
i'm sorry but i'm sure the a700 can take better shots than that tree photo.
*waits for reviews*
Yeah, that pictures in particular looks like a blown up 7400 shot.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 09:39 PM
Don't kiss @ss now. Time for another one-weeker soon as Deval gets back here. Harrassing and slandering a Moderator's name, you ought to be ashamed of yourself tuolumne. Deval was just trying to offer his God-honest opinion.
tuolumne
03-03-2005, 09:41 PM
lol...your right, I should:lol:
Quantum_Man
03-03-2005, 09:41 PM
Well I'm glad to see that the 5600 is finally out and people actually have it in their hands. However seeing the pictures provided thus far I am thoroughly not impressed. I'd expect much clearer pictures, sharp and in focus. I really don't know what to think. Maybe those were just badly taken pictures or examples? Anyway I also await Deval's and others reviews. ;)
Rafy186
03-03-2005, 09:45 PM
Has Anyone posted Videos??? Just one video please!!!!!!!!
Deval
03-03-2005, 09:45 PM
yeah workin on it...just letting it charge and such
Deval
03-03-2005, 09:46 PM
Deval, I was joking if you didn't already know:)
I for one await your review. Your A680 one that I can remember was excellent :tu:
yea I really liked that lil phone....this one looks pretty good so far
sel1965
03-03-2005, 10:03 PM
Sorry sammy people but no matter what you all say this new 5600 phone is still the best feature packed phone in Sprint's lineup! It will be till something better comes out maybe the A800 and then again maybe not!
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 10:05 PM
The Samsung A8 is already less of a marvel. Motorola will be coming out with 3 megapixel cameraphones around the time of its release.
sel1965
03-03-2005, 10:08 PM
The Samsung A8 is already less of a marvel. Motorola will be coming out with 3 megapixel cameraphones around the time of its release.
See there ya go! Phones are just like computers when you buy 1 a month later it's already out dated. The A800 probably won't be out till 4th quarter anyway. They may already have a 4 or 5 mega pixel phone out by then or ready to relaese by then. This 5600 is everything I could ask for in a camera phone! Im thrilled to finally have it.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 10:11 PM
I'm glad to see you enjoy it, sel. I hope to in about two weeks, myself.
sel1965
03-03-2005, 10:12 PM
I had to order my fiance one now too. She was going to take my 7400 but after seeing my new phone well lets say my Visa card balance just doubled! I am happy though for refunds I am getting the 150.00 refund for signing a new 2 year term!
bluecoyote
03-03-2005, 10:34 PM
Yeah, that pictures in particular looks like a blown up 7400 shot.
Snow is difficult for any camera to capture. The Diet Coke can looks comparable to the A&W picture if you ask me.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 10:37 PM
Where the hell is Deval? When I said take your time, I didn't mean this much time.
Ronkh
03-03-2005, 10:40 PM
I appreciate you guys waiting for my review :tu:
Well hurry it up already. If I can't play with my own, I may as well read what yours is like. Oh yeah, mebbe I can call my office tomorrow and ask how they like it.
pdx77
03-03-2005, 10:48 PM
Snow is difficult for any camera to capture. The Diet Coke can looks comparable to the A&W picture if you ask me.
The leaves shouldn't be all blury like that, also the diet coke pic was way too blury as well, does anyone know if it was taken using macro mode?
That A&W can picture is not the best picture taken with the tm150.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 10:49 PM
does anyone know if it was taken using macro mode?Nope, that's the problem.
sneak
03-03-2005, 10:57 PM
Tuolumne, I was too harsh on you. I only discredit your opinions on Sanyo phones. :)
I personally think the pictures look alright, except the snow ones.
Felicia
03-03-2005, 11:05 PM
Where the hell is Deval? When I said take your time, I didn't mean this much time.
I told him to get some rest. He may have it tomorrow.
Deval, and I meant it GO TO BED!!
bluecoyote
03-03-2005, 11:18 PM
The leaves shouldn't be all blury like that, also the diet coke pic was way too blury as well, does anyone know if it was taken using macro mode?
That A&W can picture is not the best picture taken with the tm150.
No it isn't. I've seen some good pictures taken with the Tm150, and it's neck and neck with the Nokia 7610 (which I think is better in low light / tricky situations, where the TM150 is best outdoors with Macro)
But when you compare the 5600 to the V710, the Samsung EV-DO phone, the A700, the 8940, and P735, it's a fairly good picture.
Bigglesworth
03-03-2005, 11:28 PM
To be quite honest, I am not impressed.
Maybe the pics need to be resized, but they look horrible to me.
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 11:34 PM
Lackluster perhaps, wouldn't say horrible, though.
pdx77
03-03-2005, 11:35 PM
Lackluster perhaps, wouldn't say horrible, though.
I would of expected better from a phone that cost over $400.
sel1965
03-03-2005, 11:36 PM
To be quite honest, I am not impressed.
Maybe the pics need to be resized, but they look horrible to me.
I think the pictures are right in line with a new phone. I remember when the 8920 first came out I had trouble getting pictures to come out nice. After several days of playing with the settings I actually was able to get really good pics. You may not be impressed which is fine I'm sure there are plenty others who are and are very happy with their new 5600 as I am!
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 11:40 PM
I'll agree with mtied that for $400+, they should look better than what I'm seeing.
I would be all for this passing of judgment had we been three weeks into the official release date, but folks, we don't even know what settings were used. We don't know anything except they are posted pictures taken with the Sanyo 5600. Give it time.
sel1965
03-03-2005, 11:42 PM
The camera is only one of the many features of this phone! I feel the price is pretty well justified! If someone is willing to pay for it then it is well priced, like I said earlier there will be plenty of people who will enjoy thier new phones. I happen to like the screen on this phone. I happen to really like the sound of the mp3 player sounds pretty darn good if you ask me. Headphones work well also. Ready link works, phone can dial out and receive calls without problem. Speaker phone is awsome better than any other sanyo out there. Menu is easy to use well set up could of been a little more colorful but hey better than the 5500. Speaking of the 5500 which this phone is replacing the camera on the 5600 is by far much better than that one, so you see well justified in price. If you want to wait 3 or 4 months the price may come down like it did with the 5500. So good luck!
CoreyTheGent
03-03-2005, 11:57 PM
Unfortunately people don't want to see the big picture (no pun intended), they just want to narrow it down to two or three things, namely the camera and UI. I'm not attacking them or anything, nor justifying it, but that's just the way it is.
'Sides, how many people were on a message board somewhere criticizing the Razr V3 during its initial release? How many Sanyo-Haters were around here tearing up the 5500 and 7400 when it was released? How many people are gonna be all excited about seeing "Revenge of the Sith" just to find out it's pretty mediocre like the previous Star Wars remakes? It's what comes with hype. The 5600 has everything it needs to withstand the hype and maintain longevity just like the Razr and that movie, but first it's gonna have to take a beating from naysayers.
Ladies and gents, welcome to the "Beating Phase."
sel1965
03-04-2005, 12:03 AM
Unfortunately people don't want to see the big picture (no pun intended), they just want to narrow it down to two or three things, namely the camera and UI. I'm not attacking them or anything, nor justifying it, but that's just the way it is.
'Sides, how many people were on a message board somewhere criticizing the Razr V3 during its initial release? How many Sanyo-Haters were around here tearing up the 5500 and 7400 when it was released? How many people are gonna be all excited about seeing "Revenge of the Sith" just to find out it's pretty mediocre like the previous Star Wars remakes? It's what comes with hype. The 5600 has everything it needs to withstand the hype and maintain longevity just like the Razr and that movie, but first it's gonna have to take a beating from naysayers.
Ladies and gents, welcome to the "Beating Phase."
I totally agree with you Cory! :good:
Deval
03-04-2005, 12:05 AM
Unfortunately people don't want to see the big picture (no pun intended), they just want to narrow it down to two or three things, namely the camera and UI. I'm not attacking them or anything, nor justifying it, but that's just the way it is.
'Sides, how many people were on a message board somewhere criticizing the Razr V3 during its initial release? How many Sanyo-Haters were around here tearing up the 5500 and 7400 when it was released? How many people are gonna be all excited about seeing "Revenge of the Sith" just to find out it's pretty mediocre like the previous Star Wars remakes? It's what comes with hype. The 5600 has everything it needs to withstand the hype and maintain longevity just like the Razr and that movie, but first it's gonna have to take a beating from naysayers.
Ladies and gents, welcome to the "Beating Phase."
you are a smart man
tuolumne
03-04-2005, 12:11 AM
All in all, from the pictures we have been presented with, this camera is a typical CMOS. I don't know why any of you were expecting more...
sel1965
03-04-2005, 12:17 AM
All in all, from the pictures we have been presented with, this camera is a typical CMOS. I don't know why any of you were expecting more...
Well I am so glad I have a phone that has a 1.3 megapixel camera on it that I carry with me everywhere I go and can take a picture of anything with a moments notice. I am so glad I have the abiltiy to print that picture from my printer as soon as I get home. I am so glad I don't have to carry my 3.2 megaopixel camera with me everywhere I go. Hey for that this phone kicks ***
tuolumne
03-04-2005, 12:21 AM
That's great. I'm sure you'll be in for a major suprise when you compare your 3.2 digi-cams shots your cameraphone's. That's being completely unrealistic.
mooney73
03-04-2005, 01:52 AM
not to mention the lack of variety as they mostly came from one person in one climate. 5600 hasn't even been fully released yet, it's far too early to pass judgment.
Corey's right... and it's a cold climate at that. Perhaps the frigid weather slowed the CMOS processor and prevented it from taking pictures that looked like anything other than something from Monet or an A-ha video. ... {looks around for some more straws to grasp}
The 5600 has been "fully released," just not fully evaluated. Aside from some sort of OTA hail mary firmware upgrade, we can pretty much expect that this is the best this image processor can do.
Although I arrived at this conclusion on my own, I'll echo what other's have said: This camera phone isn't worth $430+ in the spring of 2005. The MP3 player, mini-disk, and pictbridge technology are all really cool ideas and I'm glad to see them implemented. And I think that the guys who have brought the phone for those features will not be disappointed. But, personally, I find the lack of even acceptable image quality disappointing, almost as much as the lack of EV-DO capability. These last two factors alone make this phone technically outdated as it hits the street, much less one that would command a nearly $500 price tag.
(and toulomne, I know you mean well... but the A800 may be a bit of a disappointment also. It's only 2 MP, while the Korean market gets 5 MP -- on a camera phone that doesn't even have autofocus. I think the industry is pulling one over on us, sluggishly introducing new feature sets that cause us to anticipate and gobble up new models, only to remain unsatiated enough to pine for and gobble up the next release.)
As for me, unless Sprint wants to offer me a $100 equipment credit to be used in conjunction with my $150/18mo discount on this phone, I'll be a Sprint ex-pat in hiatus over at Verizon with a VX8000 for a year or two, until Sprint offers products with techologies that I can quickly grow into, not out of.
Thanks alot, people, for turning my thread into a steaming pile of you-know-what. This was supposed to be a thread for pictures taken with the phone, with perhaps a little discussion about the pictures themselves. It has turned into a fiasco, as usual. I should have known.
And the only thing I got on email last night was pictures of the phone taken with a digital camera, I'll post those in another thread.
Thanks alot, people, for turning my thread into a steaming pile of you-know-what. This was supposed to be a thread for pictures taken with the phone, with perhaps a little discussion about the pictures themselves. It has turned into a fiasco, as usual. I should have known.
And the only thing I got on email last night was pictures of the phone taken with a digital camera, I'll post those in another thread.
Really sucks when people do that to your thread, man, especially when it's something that you consider important. People, I tell ya.
Getting back to the point, jh101_7 has submitted some pictures for your review...
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/JH101-1.jpg
http://userweb.suscom.net/~tfink2/JH101-2.jpg
Strider420
03-04-2005, 08:58 AM
Those don't look too bad. I would say if this phone is free from bugs, it's a winner.
jgallandt
03-04-2005, 09:03 AM
Wirelessly posted (Sanyo MM7400: Mozilla/4.0 (MobilePhone MM-7400/US/1.0) NetFront/3.1 MMP/2.0)
Those don't look too bad. I would say if this phone is free from bugs, it's a winner.
Agreed. Not Bad At All.
mooney73
03-04-2005, 09:07 AM
Correction. The MM-A800 will have an auto-focus lens.
(I meant the 5 MP Samsung doesn't have autofocus)
On topic: Well, I guess now we see how the camera responds to low light and/or motion. The motion blur is to be expected, but the dithered color noise in darkness is disappointing.
icsedge1
03-04-2005, 09:17 AM
Thanks alot, people, for turning my thread into a steaming pile of you-know-what. This was supposed to be a thread for pictures taken with the phone, with perhaps a little discussion about the pictures themselves. It has turned into a fiasco, as usual. I should have known.
And the only thing I got on email last night was pictures of the phone taken with a digital camera, I'll post those in another thread.
you dolts made Ted cry, and so he took home his empty 10 gig server and now we have nothing to play with. :(
i guess he is back - mom gave him milk and cookies to make him feel better. try playing nice today. and perhaps we need to start a new thread along the lines of the old 'Rages' forum on the ISCA bbs - that is where the Sanyo/Samsung holy war would be best battled.
sedge
MsRandall
03-04-2005, 09:18 AM
Sheesh can WE PLEASE get back to the damn Sanyo 5600 Pictures!
Tuolumne create a thread comparing the I dont have yet Samsung a800 to the Sanyo 5600 and its crappy pictures..please....
Lets please have pictures in this thread and no samsung vs sanyo BS... :mad:
you dolts made Ted cry, and so he took home his empty 10 gig server and now we have nothing to play with. :(
i guess he is back - mom gave him milk and cookies to make him feel better. try playing nice today. and perhaps we need to start a new thread along the lines of the old 'Rages' forum on the ISCA bbs - that is where the Sanyo/Samsung holy war would be best battled.
sedge
lol, no, i'm just *****in cuz this thread is supposed to be about the pictures... but whatever.
i don't own any servers, just have webspace available through my isp.
i'll keep hosting and posting. hope it benefits someone who wants to know what this camera can really do.
Sheesh can WE PLEASE get back to the damn Sanyo 5600 Pictures!
Tuolumne create a thread comparing the I dont have yet Samsung a800 to the Sanyo 5600 and its crappy pictures..please....
Lets please have pictures in this thread and no samsung vs sanyo BS... :mad:
i requested a cleanup of this thread but i realize that is a big job so i don't know where it's gonna shake out.
meanwhile, for those looking at the pics, just skip over all the flame wars and keep going.
need more pics!
mcurtiss1970
03-04-2005, 09:56 AM
i can start a Nokia v. AudioVox war thread to deflect the attention. would that help?
on topic, I think a great comparison would be to put these pics up against the ones in this article:Mobileburn Megapixel Cam Shootout (http://www.mobileburn.com/story.jsp?Page=1&Id=940)
uhh, was that the wrong link?
BTW: I'm leaving work early today to take my daughter to the eye doctor. So any pics received will be posted tomorrow AM again. Keep the sunny side UP! And no more flame wars in my thread!
mcurtiss1970
03-04-2005, 09:58 AM
uhh, was that the wrong link?
corrected the link. hope her pinkeye is cured.
Jaggrey
03-04-2005, 10:12 AM
off topic stuff cleared. Try to keep the flaming to a minimum, or take it up with that person over PM.
jh101_7
03-04-2005, 11:28 AM
the 5600 camera doesn't have fun frames... but can "tint" the pics
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0023.JPG
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0024.JPG
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0025.JPG
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0026.JPG
also it can do "sepia" "b&w" and "negative"
flipn0tic
03-04-2005, 11:36 AM
aww no sketch mode?
jh101_7
03-04-2005, 11:41 AM
i noticed that if you put pics from the pc on the minisd, it gives you a special effect option that isn't available for when you take pics with the camera saving them to minisd (or i couldn't find it), you can "stamp" the pic (see pic) (any yes you can put the stamp whereever you want on the pic)
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0028.JPG
you can do a partial zoom which gives you a box to move to the area you want to zoom in on and save it as a new pic (new pic is zoomed in) and one or two others.
jh101_7
03-04-2005, 11:42 AM
aww no sketch mode?
not that i see so far
mcurtiss1970
03-04-2005, 11:50 AM
as compared with some of the shots in the Mobileburn Megapixel comparison article (www.mobileburn.com/story.jsp?Page=1&Id=940), I'd put the 5600 somewhere in the middle of the phones compared there. Definitely better than the v710 and definitely not as good as the SE s710a.
That said, for Sprint, I think this phone was a necessary step in the right direction (not in price though) and will be ultimately seen as a success as long as the positive reviews cointinue to come in.
CoreyTheGent
03-04-2005, 11:59 AM
Are those pics in Macro-Mode, jh101?
Strider420
03-04-2005, 12:17 PM
i noticed that if you put pics from the pc on the minisd, it gives you a special effect option that isn't available for when you take pics with the camera saving them to minisd (or i couldn't find it), you can "stamp" the pic (see pic) (any yes you can put the stamp whereever you want on the pic)
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0028.JPG
you can do a partial zoom which gives you a box to move to the area you want to zoom in on and save it as a new pic (new pic is zoomed in) and one or two others.
Try shooting in a lower res and see if you can then add the stamps. On my V800, it won't let me add clip art or stickers if the image is too big.
jh101_7
03-04-2005, 12:55 PM
Are those pics in Macro-Mode, jh101?
no, Corey just regular high quality.
jh101_7
03-04-2005, 12:59 PM
Try shooting in a lower res and see if you can then add the stamps. On my V800, it won't let me add clip art or stickers if the image is too big.
ok at med/low quality it gives you "multiple shots" "stitch shot" "fun frames" and the color tone options like the pics i posted above, and it does all the other mentioned above like "stamps" etc.
flipn0tic
03-04-2005, 01:01 PM
can we see some macro mode pics then?
jh101_7
03-04-2005, 01:09 PM
Are those pics in Macro-Mode, jh101?
Corey, i tried to take a side by side pic with and without macro mode... in the pics i didn't get the same distance but you can tell the difference...
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0033.JPG
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/560A0034.JPG
Rafy186
03-04-2005, 01:46 PM
thats a big difference from macro and regular....I thought it really didnt matter
ScrapMaker
03-04-2005, 03:08 PM
the whole point of macro mode is for close up shots... I guess it physically moves the sensor, or lense...
I hate the way cam phone pics are clear in the middle and blurry around the edges... is that a limitation on CMOS or what? my 2.1 digicam is clear almost all the way up to the edge of the pic...
suneeboyboy
03-04-2005, 03:11 PM
5600 has a pretty decent Camera. I thought 1.3 was a little bit sharper than that however.
fatboy
03-04-2005, 03:16 PM
its a freakin phone
flipn0tic
03-04-2005, 03:21 PM
I hate the way cam phone pics are clear in the middle and blurry around the edges... is that a limitation on CMOS or what? my 2.1 digicam is clear almost all the way up to the edge of the pic...
i don't think it's a cmos thing. people have had the same complaints about the 5500 (not me though) so maybe it's just a trend for Sanyo camera phones...
stedlj
03-04-2005, 04:35 PM
I do believe it is because of the small lens size.
Thunderboom01
03-04-2005, 05:21 PM
[QUOTE=jh101_7]Corey, i tried to take a side by side pic with and without macro mode... in the pics i didn't get the same distance but you can tell the difference...
The macro mode is pretty impressive
CoreyTheGent
03-04-2005, 05:50 PM
How far was that map from the 5600 in that pic, jh101?
tuolumne
03-04-2005, 06:11 PM
i don't think it's a cmos thing. people have had the same complaints about the 5500 (not me though) so maybe it's just a trend for Sanyo camera phones...
it's partly that, and also the limitations of a cheap CMOS processor.
Strider420
03-04-2005, 06:39 PM
it's partly that, and also the limitations of a cheap CMOS processor.
And your an example of a cheap Samsukk fanboy. Shut up and be gone from this thread, trollmaster.
The blurry ring had plagued Sanyos since my 8100. It doesn't really matter though, I mean how often is the subject of your photo in the corner?
fatboy
03-04-2005, 06:49 PM
And your an example of a cheap Samsukk fanboy. Shut up and be gone from this thread, trollmaster.
The blurry ring had plagued Sanyos since my 8100. It doesn't really matter though, I mean how often is the subject of your photo in the corner?
OH OH ***** fight hehe nah j/k lets try to keep on topic here :cool:
Halo2Proz
03-04-2005, 07:14 PM
ok at med/low quality it gives you "multiple shots" "stitch shot" "fun frames" and the color tone options like the pics i posted above, and it does all the other mentioned above like "stamps" etc.
whats stitch shot?
Ronkh
03-04-2005, 07:21 PM
it's partly that, and also the limitations of a cheap CMOS processor.
well at least she aint calling it a lense instead of lens :D
Rafy186
03-04-2005, 08:12 PM
And your an example of a cheap Samsukk fanboy. Shut up and be gone from this thread, trollmaster.
The blurry ring had plagued Sanyos since my 8100. It doesn't really matter though, I mean how often is the subject of your photo in the corner?
Actually the 5300 had it too. TO me the blurrines in the end doesnt matter. I actually like it when its in the ends.
Strider420
03-04-2005, 08:37 PM
OH OH ***** fight hehe nah j/k lets try to keep on topic here :cool:
yeah let's just stay on topic so fatgirl can keep eating her ho hos in peace.
Strider420
03-04-2005, 08:43 PM
Actually the 5300 had it too. TO me the blurrines in the end doesnt matter. I actually like it when its in the ends.
really? I always thought the 5300 took great pics and never noticed the blurriness.
tuolumne
03-04-2005, 09:00 PM
well at least she aint calling it a lense instead of lens :D
You like calling me a she don't you?
:lmao:
FloorMatt
03-04-2005, 09:08 PM
really? I always thought the 5300 took great pics and never noticed the blurriness.
5300 sure did take great pics! The flash actually worked........you could take pictures in pitch black conditions, and they looked great! Pretty good for the first integrated camera phone in North America (wasn't it? I could swear I've seen that)
tuolumne
03-04-2005, 09:20 PM
5300 took awsome VGA pictures for it's time.
sharkdamark
03-04-2005, 09:32 PM
I love people who don't even have Sprint service but come on this forum to stir up trouble.
tuolumne
03-04-2005, 09:32 PM
hmm, and who would that be?
mcurtiss1970
03-04-2005, 09:34 PM
well, lots of people started out here and left for other carriers. it's good to see what the rest of the cellular world has to say.
KevC84
03-05-2005, 12:24 AM
whats stitch shot?
Stitch shot is basically a panoramic picture. You can "stitch" 2 or more pictures together to make a panoramic picture. This is one of the features on the 5600 and i think I will have lots of fun with it.
Deval
03-05-2005, 12:34 AM
Stitch shot is basically a panoramic picture. You can "stitch" 2 or more pictures together to make a panoramic picture. This is one of the features on the 5600 and i think I will have lots of fun with it.
after trying it...it doesnt do a panoramic...rather, it lets u make 1/2 a pic then add to it
OK folks, here is a comparisn picture you all probably want to see.
I took these pictures at the exact same time side by side.
First is 8200, second is 5600.
flipn0tic
03-05-2005, 01:07 AM
wow i kinda like the 8200's better...
FloorMatt
03-05-2005, 01:10 AM
wow i kinda like the 8200's better...
I agree! :)
Rafy186
03-05-2005, 01:10 AM
wow i kinda like the 8200's better...
I like the 5600 better. It has more colors to it.
FloorMatt
03-05-2005, 01:12 AM
Perhaps Dave can tell us which picture shows the colors more accurately?
They look a little bled on the 5600 pic
Rafy186
03-05-2005, 01:12 AM
Well I just looked at it again n noticed that the 5600 has more colors to the vase but the 8200 has an overall better background to it.
flipn0tic
03-05-2005, 01:27 AM
it's almost too colorful.
Perhaps Dave can tell us which picture shows the colors more accurately?
They look a little bled on the 5600 pic
Yeah.. I'm not sure which shows more accurately.... both are off a little bit. I'm not sure which I like better but I guess I'll be playing around this weekend.
I just got back from a bachelor party and am trying to play around with this phone... however I am not 100% sober and should probably be sleeping. :D
tuolumne
03-05-2005, 02:19 AM
uh, OK...:huh:
jgallandt
03-05-2005, 02:23 AM
Wirelessly posted (Sanyo MM7400: Mozilla/4.0 (MobilePhone MM-7400/US/1.0) NetFront/3.1 MMP/2.0)
Perhaps Dave can tell us which picture shows the colors more accurately?
They look a little bled on the 5600 pic
Yeah.. I'm not sure which shows more accurately.... both are off a little bit. I'm not sure which I like better but I guess I'll be playing around this weekend.
I just got back from a bachelor party and am trying to play around with this phone... however I am not 100% sober and should probably be sleeping. :D
How Much Did The 5600 Have To Drink?
sneak
03-05-2005, 02:30 AM
after trying it...it doesnt do a panoramic...rather, it lets u make 1/2 a pic then add to it
Have you uploaded the picture to your PC yet?
The Canon powershot line of digital cameras offer stitch mode. It works seemlessly, and provides excellent pictures. It takes 2+ pictures and "stitches" them together. I'm almost positive it is the same mode.
jh101_7
03-05-2005, 08:08 AM
How far was that map from the 5600 in that pic, jh101?
about 3-4 inches
jh101_7
03-05-2005, 08:10 AM
What's stitch shot?
it patches two pic together, vertical or horizontal. almost like panaromanic.
jh101_7
03-05-2005, 08:21 AM
Flipnotic, you asked what "fun frames" the 5600 has... here are all nine of them in a zip file...
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/funframes5600.zip
fatboy
03-05-2005, 08:25 AM
Flipnotic, you asked what "fun frames" the 5600 has... here are all nine of them in a zip file...
http://www.southsidefunnies.com/go/files/funframes5600.zip
them look pretty cool.
flipn0tic
03-05-2005, 09:04 AM
heh, not bad... definitely better than the ones on the 5500. thanks for posting them
Halo2Proz
03-05-2005, 09:13 AM
yeah this is stitch shot...its not really panaramic (sp)
jh101_7
03-05-2005, 09:29 AM
welcome, Flip
Jonacell
03-05-2005, 11:16 AM
Comparsion pics: I like the 8200's shot better. The 5600's picture reminds me a little of the 5500's pics. It has a yellowish/orange tint to it. The 5600 has more color on the vase, but i feel like it's over doing it. The red is radioactive in that vase. I also think the 8200's shot is sharper...
Marco mode is pretty good on the 5600 though. There's a lot of times where i've wanted to take a close up shot but just couldn't. i'm glad the 5600 has marco mode. dolla dolla bills ya'll :)
Another thing to point out is that the wood salad bowl looks better in the 8200's pic.
defiant
03-05-2005, 12:14 PM
macro mode...
wow.
how much light is on the bill?
What do you mean, how much light? I believe when I took it, I was standing under a recessed light about 8 feet above me.
nipjones
03-05-2005, 05:11 PM
what is macro mode if you dont mind me asking?
thanks
Taking close-up pictures of small things is called "macro photography." I grabbed that line from http://www.photo.net/macro/primer. :)
Here's a picture I took this afternoon at the grocery store. Nice colors, I think!
CoreyTheGent
03-05-2005, 06:47 PM
Are you a photographer or something, Dave? Got steady hands? It seems your pictures always come out looking great. I don't see what everybody has to complain about.
ScrapMaker
03-05-2005, 09:42 PM
so you cannot use stitch-shot to create a panoramic?
also, you can't use stitch-shot in full resolution mode? that would ruin it for me, because I'd never use anything less than the highest quality.
StevenJW
03-05-2005, 09:45 PM
I hate the way cam phone pics are clear in the middle and blurry around the edges... is that a limitation on CMOS or what? my 2.1 digicam is clear almost all the way up to the edge of the pic...
I would guess it is more a lense issue than a sensor issue. With a lense that is always exposed all the time, they need to make the lense very rugged. I suspect they lose something in the optics in the process.
Deval
03-05-2005, 11:50 PM
my car dash with the 5600
Deval
03-05-2005, 11:50 PM
gas prices havent dropped yet
Deval
03-05-2005, 11:51 PM
my other tech playing with his 5600 :hee:
Deval
03-05-2005, 11:51 PM
I really like this picture...taken with NO macro mode
fatboy
03-05-2005, 11:53 PM
my car dash with the 5600
yet another shameless atempt at flashing that headunit :joy:
Deval
03-05-2005, 11:54 PM
yet another shameless atempt at flashing that headunit :joy:
:lol: I really like the radio...@ 13 my ears start to hurt
Deval
03-05-2005, 11:59 PM
normal pix:
http://www.desistylz.com/uploads/56001.jpg
Deval
03-06-2005, 12:00 AM
another random pix:
http://www.desistylz.com/uploads/56002.jpg
FloorMatt
03-06-2005, 12:11 AM
Aww that poor Toshiba! And.......what's up with those big res. images?
ScrapMaker
03-06-2005, 12:18 AM
eh kinda hard to judge in such small resolution...
Deval
03-06-2005, 12:45 AM
Aww that poor Toshiba! And.......what's up with those big res. images?
:lol: thats 1.3mp
flipn0tic
03-06-2005, 12:48 AM
those outdoor pics are effin beautiful
SprintUsers.com was created in January 2002 as a resource for users of Sprint PCS products and services to learn about and share information. We have cll phone reviews, Cellular Accessories, Downloads, PDA reviews, Ringtones, all of the latest Sprint PCS news and information, an area where you can find help in creating a ring tone or custom image for you phone, and so much more. The most popular section is the message board where visitors can read and write messages, ask questions, and get advice about their cellular phone from other users.
Content Copyright © 2002-2007 SprintUsers
vBulletin® v3.8.3, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.