Have any feedback?

[Dave]

We appreciate your support here at SprintUsers.com and thank you for being a part of it!

Please take a moment if you wish, and provide feedback about your experience here. Are you happy with the way us moderators run the site? Are the guidelines working for everyone?

As this site grows, flame wars and trolls are unfortunately something we have to deal with. If a user disrespects our forum's community guidelines, they are warned via PM. If they continue to cause trouble then their account is immediately locked from posting.

I've heard of other forums out there implementing temporary bans but it is my personal opinion that banning on a temporary basis is like giving a child a time-out. We're all adults here and I don't feel that our moderators should have to deal with spending so much time babysitting problem users.

I appreciate any thoughts you have on this issue and welcome your feedback.

Thank you so much for your support!

Dave
SprintUsers.com

[A six double 0]

As this site grows, flame wars and trolls are unfortunately something we have to deal with. If a user disrespects our forum's community guidelines, they are warned via PM. If they continue to cause trouble then their account is immediately locked from posting.

I've heard of other forums out there implementing temporary bans but it is my personal opinion that banning on a temporary basis is like giving a child a time-out. We're all adults here and I don't feel that our moderators should have to deal with spending so much time babysitting problem users.
Personally I see no point in banning people, even the trouble makers. The reason is that 9 out of 10 times the person is going to sign back up. So what if you IP ban them? They will use a proxy server. So what's the point of banning them at all, other than a formality?

[stonedtseller]

Personally I see no point in banning people, even the trouble makers. The reason is that 9 out of 10 times the person is going to sign back up. So what if you IP ban them? They will use a proxy server. So what's the point of banning them at all, other than a formality?

Exactly and with ISP's like AOL or cable ISP's that use dynamic IPs, it doesn't take any effort to log off and log back on to refresh their IP. Banning people is as pointless as a restraining order, sure you can formally tell them to stay away but it can't KEEP them away if they are bent on coming back and breaking hell.

[Zenlore1]

We appreciate your support here at SprintUsers.com and thank you for being a part of it!

Please take a moment if you wish, and provide feedback about your experience here. Are you happy with the way us moderators run the site? Are the guidelines working for everyone?

As this site grows, flame wars and trolls are unfortunately something we have to deal with. If a user disrespects our forum's community guidelines, they are warned via PM. If they continue to cause trouble then their account is immediately locked from posting.

I've heard of other forums out there implementing temporary bans but it is my personal opinion that banning on a temporary basis is like giving a child a time-out. We're all adults here and I don't feel that our moderators should have to deal with spending so much time babysitting problem users.

I appreciate any thoughts you have on this issue and welcome your feedback.

Thank you so much for your support!

Dave
SprintUsers.com

Humm in the time I have been with this board I have learn one truth that seems to hold true to Dave and all the Morderators, see as follows:

Your Damn if you do, and your Damn if you don't

I can't think of one time were everyone on this board was happy with what ever the top mods and Dave does lol, ok ok maybe when SprintUsers was started thats about the only time lol

But just wish to Say I am pleased and Happy with the board, I don't expect Perfection (seeing its a free board not paysite) from you guys, but In my opinion you do a great job Maintaining it :)

Thank you for the ability and opportunity to be able to use your server space to share my thoughts and others upon this board :)

[Ted]

I made my suggestion here:

http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54064

But either not many have noticed it or no one cares. Oh well, it doesn't matter to me anyway, just something I saw that would make some people happier.

I am happy with SU as is.

[tuolumne]

I've heard of other forums out there implementing temporary bans but it is my personal opinion that banning on a temporary basis is like giving a child a time-out. We're all adults here and I don't feel that our moderators should have to deal with spending so much time babysitting problem users.



I beleive that you should implement temporary, weekly bans...Respected members always have outbursts that breaks the guidlines...It's bound to happen...But does that mean that one should be banned forever for having a couple outburst when they regularly add to the community...? I don't think so...

I beleive that temporary banns do work...It can be looked at as a time out, but however childish it might seem, it does work...I have had 2 temp. bans at Howard Forums in my existence there...I would have found it very unfair to get banned at my first offense...I regularly contribute to discussion there, and I do not feel it fit to be banned (ESPECIALLY since my first temp. ban was because of flaming some troll here that wouldn't stop creating numerous user accounts on hofo)...I beleive that you SHOULD impliment a temporary ban system...Based on how YOU and certain moderators feel that the offender positively contribute to the discussion. If they don't, then a permanent ban might be in order...

And contributers...I bleleive that you should impliment some kind of system...This is why we had that troll here last week on numerous different ip's asking to get his original one unlocked...he was a contributer (paid $$), and got banned...You need to work out some kind of system with them, becuase someone who paid $80 to sprintusers.com does not deserve to be permanently banned unless they really go wacky...

Hope you take some of this into consideration...

-enmulout

[tuolumne]

I made my suggestion here:

http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54064

But either not many have noticed it or no one cares. Oh well, it doesn't matter to me anyway, just something I saw that would make some people happier.

I am happy with SU as is.


I care T ;)

[Dave]

To me, restricting access on a temporary basis means we don't care if users disrespect our community guidelines. After the temporary restriction is lifted on their account, the probelm user will probably start causing trouble again. So then we'd have to come up with a guideline that says X amount of temp restrictions = permanent ban.

That would require myself and the mods to keep a running list of who has been 'banned' and how many times -- sounds like babysitting, and SU ain't no babysitting service.:hee: This would take a lot of time to maintain.

As I said, we're all adults here and should respect one another. Let's keep this discussion open -- I am not opposed to changing our current method unless an additional great deal of effort is required to handle the issue.

Dave

[tuolumne]

To me, restricting access on a temporary basis means we don't care if users disrespect our community guidelines. After the temporary restriction is lifted on their account, the probelm user will probably start causing trouble again. So then we'd have to come up with a guideline that says X amount of temp restrictions = permanent ban.

That would require myself and the mods to keep a running list of who has been 'banned' and how many times -- sounds like babysitting, and SU ain't no babysitting service.:hee: This would take a lot of time to maintain.

As I said, we're all adults here and should respect one another. Let's keep this discussion open -- I am not opposed to changing our current method unless an additional great deal of effort is required to handle the issue.

Dave

But what I am trying to say is that the current banning guidlines are in no way fair to anyone...

Respected users can get banned permanently even if they regularly add to the discussion..

I would say that you have to make a system with the mods where you discuss whether a temporary ban is appropriate for a certain user or a temporary ban...If the person regularly contributes, then a temp. ban would be good...If the person is constantly on the offensive to users, then a permenate ban might be...

I just feel that the guidlines here need a MAJOR overhual... ;)

[Dave]

I appreciate your comments however if we implement a system like you explain then we are certainly not fair across the board.

Anybody who is a great contributor of discussion to our forums must be held accountable and face the same consequences as any other user who decides to disrespect our community's guidelines.

You feel that our guidelines need an overhaul? How so?

Dave

[tuolumne]

I appreciate your comments however if we implement a system like you explain then we are certainly not fair across the board.

Anybody who is a great contributor of discussion to our forums must be held accountable and face the same consequences as any other user who decides to disrespect our community's guidelines.

You feel that our guidelines need an overhaul? How so?

Dave

I understand that, but I think that your current banning guidlines are much to strict...

[Hola]

I agree. I think you maybe should do one verbal warning or one tempory ban though before the parement ban.

A lot of new members may not know that certain words may offened others. I am not talking about swearing but the small stuff if you say. But I think you (Dave) and all the mods are doing a great job maintaining this board. I want to say thank you for keeping it fun.

The best part is redirecting all the threats into one thread. Closing threads is the best thing.

The one thing I would suggest though, is maybe dividing up the general form into like plan part and phone section. That would help people who need to get help with the plan, and people who have question with phones. I understand that might be hard to implment since we already have so many sections and I know people (including myself) hate going to different sections. But it might be a great help to the person wanting to find help faster.

[chryslerfan]

Banning has gotten out of hand. We have lost some funny, helpful, good people to all the bans. This forum does seem very uptight.

[tuolumne]

Banning has gotten out of hand. We have lost some funny, helpful, good people to all the bans. This forum does seem very uptight.


I *really* second that...

[mcurtiss1970]

perma-banning is pointless if people are just allowed to re-sign up with another user name.

i say just put people on mini-vacations if they get out of hand. if the user gets enough temp-vacations, if they don't learn, they'll end up being banned more often than active. by this method, a mod doesn't have to keep track of how many the user has had.

[Dave]

I agree. I think you maybe should do one verbal warning or one tempory ban though before the parement ban.
Users are certainly warned via PM that their account will be locked if they continue to disrespect the guidelines. If they blow off the message then they know what's coming before it happens.

[Dave]

perma-banning is pointless if people are just allowed to re-sign up with another user name.
As of a few weeks ago we now lock accounts for users who have recently come back as new IDs.

i say just put people on mini-vacations if they get out of hand. if the user gets enough temp-vacations, if they don't learn, they'll end up being banned more often than active. by this method, a mod doesn't have to keep track of how many the user has had.When someone is temp-banned, how do they know it is temp, and how do they know how many more days they are banned for?

[mcurtiss1970]

When someone is temp-banned, how do they know it is temp, and how do they know how many more days they are banned for?
i know that Hofo's forum software blocks you out for a set period of time and it automatically expires after the set time.

[Dave]

i know that Hofo's forum software blocks you out for a set period of time and it automatically expires after the set time.
I understand that, but my question is how does the user know how long he/she has been banned for?

[mcurtiss1970]

I understand that, but my question is how does the user know how long he/she has been banned for?
I think there's a message that that says something like "banned until 12:30 12/1/2004" or something like that. when you try to log on, all you see is that message- no access to forums at all.

[Ted]

interesting discussion, i've been following it.

every user is different. some users may change their attitude after being "timed out" some inievitably won't.

i for one think that sometimes people get banned when what they have done isn't really that bad, but other times it seems like certain users go on and on long after something should be done.

bottom line, it's hard to apply guidelines fairly and i think the mods deserve a lot of credit for trying. because everyone's situation is different and everyone's opinion of any given post is subjective.

also, the person being banned will ALWAYS think it's unfair.

tough issue.

[Dave]

also, the person being banned will ALWAYS think it's unfair.

You've got that right. Then often the person re-registers and b*tches about it and cries that they didn't do anything because the mods removed the flaming / fighting / whatever they did evidence from the public's eyes.

Let's keep this discussion open and see what other ideas are presented.

[Ted]

another thing. it was mentioned that a lot of banned users come back with a new name, and that may be true, but i have noticed that some come back with a more "low key" approach and some come back with a vengence. those that come back with a vengence get rebanned several times and inevitably go away on their own, or decide to toe the line.

[Ted]

i think the key to this whole issue is separating issues out. there are certain things a user can do that would warrant a ban and then there are posts that cause controversy because of other's perceptions.

if you think about it, a lot of posts get reacted to because of the attitude that gets read into it... this is a grey area... stuff like this maybe should be edited or deleted by mods but not necessarily banned.

i think the thing to do is if a post falls in a grey area, mods would edit or delete it, whereas if there are blatent violations of the guidelines they would be banned (or temp banned) or whatever.

[Hola]

What do people think about dividing the general forum into phone section and plan section?

Anyone else agree that that would save time and have threads sorted better.

[Dave]

Hola, check out this thread for the topic you mentioned...

http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=54064

Dave

[tuolumne]

i know that Hofo's forum software blocks you out for a set period of time and it automatically expires after the set time.

Yes, when you try to access howardforums.com, a vBulletin box will be on the screen with the mod's comments on why you got a temp ban, and when you will be allowed to return...

I think that you should impliment a system like this...

Sprintusers has lost many great users due to these very uptight guidelines..

[Ted]

If Dave changes his policy on banning, let's all help out by not abusing the policy and thereby creating a ton of work for the admins and mods.

[Dave]

What do you think of these new guidelines for locking posting access?

If a user disrespects the guidelines, they are warned via PM.

If they do it again, the account is locked from posting for a period of one week.

After the week is up the user's account is automatically unlocked and can post once again.

If the user disrespects the guidelines again, the account is locked for another week.

After 3 account locks in a 6-month period, the account is permanently locked from posting.

Does this seem fair? Does the locking timeline work, is 3 chances too few or too many? Thanks for your feedback on this topic.

Dave

[Ted]

Here's a suggestion - site-wide amnesty. Declare that all banned users accounts are unlocked and give them a fresh start. Make sure they understand that they can be locked again just as easily.

Then do a policy change. Three step process - step 1, PM Warning in writing, step 2, temp ban - i'd say make it 3 days to a week depending on the seriousness of the offense, after 2 temp bans the third ban is permanent.

Certain offenses (like real obvious and blatent disregard for the entire forum and guidelines) could be permaban after a single warning.

The trick is to define exactly what the offenses are so no confusion. And maybe give a benefit of the doubt if a policy is unclear.

And finally, ASK the users participation in making the new guidelines work - we can make sprintusers a better place and giving everyone a better shot at long-term participation vs. being kicked out for a single mistake, but their help is needed to not abuse the guidelines.

Also note somewhere in there that if these policies are abused than the original guidelines will be reinstated.

[Ted]

What do you think of these new guidelines for locking posting access?



Does this seem fair? Does the locking timeline work, is 3 chances too few or too many? Thanks for your feedback on this topic.

Dave

I'd say three chances is good for normal situations.

I'd also say that if a user completely and blatantly disrespects the community then a permanent ban can be issued at any time. example - harrasment of other users, excessive name calling, derogitory or racist remarks, excessive off-topic posting or thread flooding, etc.

Also of note, the most minor of offenses could be edited and explained by PM not necessarily a warning that the account would be locked.

[mcurtiss1970]

What do you think of these new guidelines for locking posting access?



Does this seem fair? Does the locking timeline work, is 3 chances too few or too many? Thanks for your feedback on this topic.

Dave
sounds fair......

[chryslerfan]

Three strikes and you're out? Sounds fair.

[Ted]

Three strikes and you're out? Sounds fair.

Swinnnnnnnnnngggggg batter batter swing!

[tuolumne]

Three strikes and you're out? Sounds fair.

Thats the law in California ;)

[Aeternavi]

Here's a suggestion - site-wide amnesty. Declare that all banned users accounts are unlocked and give them a fresh start. Make sure they understand that they can be locked again just as easily.

Then do a policy change. Three step process - step 1, PM Warning in writing, step 2, temp ban - i'd say make it 3 days to a week depending on the seriousness of the offense, after 2 temp bans the third ban is permanent.

Certain offenses (like real obvious and blatent disregard for the entire forum and guidelines) could be permaban after a single warning.

The trick is to define exactly what the offenses are so no confusion. And maybe give a benefit of the doubt if a policy is unclear.

And finally, ASK the users participation in making the new guidelines work - we can make sprintusers a better place and giving everyone a better shot at long-term participation vs. being kicked out for a single mistake, but their help is needed to not abuse the guidelines.

Also note somewhere in there that if these policies are abused than the original guidelines will be reinstated.


I say this method is perfect.

Dave, you can ban IPs right?

I think even 3 strikes is more than fair. I would ban someone after the second on my board.... although in over a year, I have only banned 1 person.

[newusa]

Hi all, long time luker, first time poster.

I find it absolutlely hilarious that Dave continues to post this type of awful propaganda to plug himself as a "caring admin." I think we all should know that not a darn thing is going to change whatsoever around here, and that the thoughts provided in this thread is merely be ignored much as many other things around here.

But, prove me wrong, here is my suggestion; Dave, Sell SU. It's the best thing you can do for it. You have proven yourself as a 2 faced backstabbling liar many a time, and you have no control whatsoever around this website. So, I challenge you to make a proper move for a site that you claim to care about, sell it. It will be the only decent thing you have done for it in the past few years.

[Aeternavi]

Wow, that will be the first test for Dave right there.

Say what you may, but I think he is doing a good job. You try taking on a board of this diversity and see if you too can babysit 16,000 members.

Two faced? If you treat him like ****, I am sure he will give it right back to you. I have shown nothing but respect for him as a fellow forum owner, and in return, he has given it back.

Dave, you got MY thumbs up at least!!!

[newusa]

Wow, that will be the first test for Dave right there.

Say what you may, but I think he is doing a good job. You try taking on a board of this diversity and see if you too can babysit 16,000 members.

Two faced? If you treat him like $h!+, I am sure he will give it right back to you. I have shown nothing but respect for him as a fellow forum owner, and in return, he has given it back.

Dave, you got MY thumbs up at least!!!

Well that's fine and dandy that you're a forum admin, it must make you feel important..which is why I can see why Dave got into it. As for the relevant topic at hand, 16000 members?! hardly, remember he has banned a good number of those people, the remaining 15000 havent ever posted, or even visited in years.

I agree with the respect gets respect....but I have never seen him respect anyone, so by default he doesn't get mine. Ohh, that may get me banned, but I think I'll make it till tomorrow.

[Ted]

newusa, holy crap, what a way to make your posting debut on a forum... what positive result could you possibly expect from that kind of attitude?

i agree with you that sometimes things aren't fair, and i've had discussions with Dave myself regarding that very topic. but you have to address the issues with some basic courtesy -- calling someone a backstabbing liar and making downtrodden statements like "nothing will ever change" doesn't help anything.

here's a thought for you, and I don't know you from adam, but I challenge you to post, in this thread, specific issues that need to be addressed from your point of view. without name calling and being excessively negative. tell all of us what you think is unfair, right here, without resorting to dissing anyone. see if you can do it.

[Dave]

newusa = dboogie2288. Don't worry about him, his account was locked back in May for repeatedly disrespecting our community guidelines by posting links to a site designed to flame users of this one.

When I started this site I never imagined that we would ever experience such intense fighting. C`mon... this is just a site about mobile phones. But I guess every board will have its share of trolls to deal with.

See something offensive posted? Just report it by clicking the 'Report' link at the bottom-right of the message and one of our moderators will quickly deal with it.

Anyway -- it looks like we have some support for our proposed system of locking accounts if necessary. And this will apply to everyone unless the circumstance is extreme - such as someone registering with the sole intention of flaming users, etc.

We'll start this tomorrow and see how it works out.

Thanks to all for your support,
Dave
SprintUsers.com

[Jaggrey]

Then do a policy change. Three step process - step 1, PM Warning in writing, step 2, temp ban - i'd say make it 3 days to a week depending on the seriousness of the offense, after 2 temp bans the third ban is permanent.

Certain offenses (like real obvious and blatent disregard for the entire forum and guidelines) could be permaban after a single warning.

The trick is to define exactly what the offenses are so no confusion. And maybe give a benefit of the doubt if a policy is unclear.

And finally, ASK the users participation in making the new guidelines work - we can make sprintusers a better place and giving everyone a better shot at long-term participation vs. being kicked out for a single mistake, but their help is needed to not abuse the guidelines.

Also note somewhere in there that if these policies are abused than the original guidelines will be reinstated.
That sounds good... I like that.

[Marlon_JB2]

Hmm, I thought newusa was Fhantazm... on topic...

I don't have a single problem with the way SU is run now, although, I do believe that every forum should have its own moderator, and it should specifically state who's the mod in that particular forum, no matter how big or small it may be. Just IMO. As a forum admin myself, I personally don't know how hard it is to manage a site as big as SU, because on the site where I'm an admin.. there's only a little under 400 members.

[Ted]

How about reorganizing the forums completely? http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showpost.php?p=471262&postcount=24

[mcurtiss1970]

How about reorganizing the forums completely? http://www.sprintusers.com/forum/showpost.php?p=471262&postcount=24
where is the "mixed drink recipes" forum?

[Ted]

where is the "mixed drink recipes" forum?

in the watercooler. maybe we should rename it beer tap.

[mcurtiss1970]

in the watercooler. maybe we should rename it beer tap. I prefer "The Regal Beagle"


Whatever happens will likely be fine, but I still think too many subforums will mean mods wil constantly be moving threads into their "correct" new subforum.

[Ted]

I prefer "The Regal Beagle"

How bout the Dew Drop Inn (in the great tradition of Charlie Daniels)?

Back on topic, we should also have a section for plans and pricing?

[Ted]

Whatever happens will likely be fine, but I still think too many subforums will mean mods wil constantly be moving threads into their "correct" new subforum.

Your'e right. Back to the drawing board - I shall return!

[Ted]

Here... same number of forums we have now, just slightly tweaked...


Sprintusers.com

News and Announcements
Frequently Asked Questions
Forum Info / Feedback
Wireless Store

Sprint PCS Basics

General Discussion
Phone Reviews
Phone Warranties and Insurance
Rate Plans and Discounts

Sprint PCS Enhanced Services

Vision, Messaging, and Ready link
Ringers, Images, Games, Apps
PDA Phones and Computer Connectivity
Tips and Tricks

Related and Unrelated Topics

Watercooler
Trading Post
Off-Topic Electronics and Carriers
Test Forum

[Marlon_JB2]

Ugh, that'll make surfing on WiForums even worse than it is now. :( Can we just get all the forums on one WiPage, instead of having to click each forum, and sub forum?

[Ted]

Ugh, that'll make surfing on WiForums even worse than it is now. :( Can we just get all the forums on one WiPage, instead of having to click each forum, and sub forum?

Then put the 16 forums all in one section? I don't know, I can't imagine trying to read all this on a 2 inch screen to begin with, but to each his own, I guess.

[tuolumne]

I don't like any of the idea's proposed...It's FINE the way it is now...

[GaryK]

I don't like any of the idea's proposed...It's FINE the way it is now...

u got ur old scrteenname back?

[Dave]

As a part of the new account warning/locking system we have unlocked a number of previously locked accounts and merged necessary IDs together.

[Marlon_JB2]

merged necessary IDs together.

You can do that? Oh, wait.. you did. :)

May I ask who else was unlocked?

[Dave]

All users who has been previously locked were 'unlocked' - with the exception of those who registered with the sole intention of spamming or flaming users.

[tuolumne]

Then put the 16 forums all in one section? I don't know, I can't imagine trying to read all this on a 2 inch screen to begin with, but to each his own, I guess.


What's up Ted :hee:

[pdx77]

All users who has been previously locked were 'unlocked' - with the exception of those who registered with the sole intention of spamming or flaming users.
Good deal! Nice to have my old nickname back.

[tuolumne]

Good deal! Nice to have my old nickname back.

what was your old one...?

[pdx77]

what was your old one...?
Perhaps my avatar might help. I was Fire.

[Matt]

Wirelessly posted (Sharp TM150: SHARP-TM-150/1.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.2.6.c.2.102 (GUI) MMP/1.0)

Well what do you know. :)

[Marlon_JB2]

mtied = Fire

Even PDXMatt is back. This may just be good news after all...

[GaryK]

i am surprised we don't see awesomedeals88 posting

[Marlon_JB2]

You just HAD to open your mouth. :hee:

So, uh, is he free to post as well?

[pdx77]

:woohoo:

<--- kisses Matt!

[Matt]

It's ironic since I have T-Mobile now. :joy: Oh well. I still keep track of Sprint and my a680 is still active.

[GaryK]

You just HAD to open your mouth. :hee:

So, uh, is he free to post as well?

hey u still remember how we used to fight him using PMs?

[Marlon_JB2]

Ahh, memories. :)

[Jaggrey]

LOL u guys are silly.:D

[tuolumne]

Ahh, memories. :)


I'm a member of the

Ban awesomedeals88 Association: Member # 1

Now, who wants to join me?

I am definitly joinin

what member number should I be?

2




ah the memories............ ;)

[pdx77]

So who wants to take a guess on who the 1st person to be banned again is?

[Aeternavi]

So who wants to take a guess on who the 1st person to be banned again is?

Check page 1 of this topic, there is your candidate.

[dboogie2288]

It's a Christmas miracle...

...am I banned again yet? :eyeroll:

[Ted]

Back in Black, bet you know I'm glad to be back!

Dave, thanks for setting all the prisoners free. I hope I speak for many of us when I say that we will still have fun but we will try our best to keep it within the guidelines.

[Ted]

Welcome back Tuolumne, Mtied, Dboogie. *cheers*

[Jaggrey]

I've got my eye on all of yous! :eyebrow:

[Ted]

I've got my eye on all of yous! :eyebrow:

It's all good. LOL! I for one, ain't lookin for no trouble, sherriff! *puts on hat and fixes brim*

[SL10]

*looks around* So, that means JJ is unbanned too? :huh:

[Matt]

Wirelessly posted (Sharp TM150: SHARP-TM-150/1.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.2.6.c.2.102 (GUI) MMP/1.0)

Now now. This is supposed to be a fresh start.

[Jaggrey]

*looks around* So, that means JJ is unbanned too? :huh:
I'm on the lookout for all Toshiba threads!

Hey what about haton?

[Yummi]

Hat was technically never banned, he just wasnt welcomed here.....

PDX, nice to see you sweety! MT, glad to see you back in you old name, DB, eh, be yourself.....on 3 instead of 12...lol

Glad you guys are back, you were definitely missed

[SL10]

I'm on the lookout for all Toshiba threads!

Hey what about haton?
Oh, HELL NO! If Haton comes back SU would be jacked again! I, for one would start drinking again if he came back. *shudders at the thought*

[SL10]

Wirelessly posted (Sharp TM150: SHARP-TM-150/1.0 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.2.6.c.2.102 (GUI) MMP/1.0)

Now now. This is supposed to be a fresh start.
*wipes the slate clean* Okay. :D

[Ted]

*wipes the slate clean* Okay. :D

That's the spirit. It will take all of us to make this a success.

[Jaggrey]

That's the spirit. It will take all of us to make this a success.
tru tru........ :cool: :D

[dboogie2288]

Don't have to worry much about me. With the decline of SU, I keep to the Trading Post, and sometimes the Watercooler....so, I'm just here as eye candy...

[mcurtiss1970]

Don't have to worry much about me. With the decline of SU, I keep to the Trading Post, and sometimes the Watercooler....so, I'm just here as eye candy...
i expect a dboogie's mindless poll #457283 any day now. :)

[Ted]

Don't have to worry much about me. With the decline of SU, I keep to the Trading Post, and sometimes the Watercooler....so, I'm just here as eye candy...

Oh come on, boog, you're not just another pretty face!

[dboogie2288]

i expect a dboogie's mindless poll #457283 any day now. :)

It'll come, dinner is only hours away... :D